this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)

Casual Conversation

2377 readers
118 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Lots and lots of stuff by the Apples in Stereo lately! I also fell in love with Manuel Göttsching's album E2-E4 which was apparently quite influential for house music, despite not being a dance track.

[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 1 points 5 hours ago

Today started as a Heilung day and ended with Burning Witches. I'll probably fall asleep to the former.

[–] tastetheplague@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I've been getting into zeuhl music in a big way. Specifically Koenjihyakkei, Zao and Corima. Also I've been really digging PoiL and Junko Ueda.

[–] LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I've never heard of zeuhl before, but just the first introductory paragraph on the wiki page for it has me deeply interested! Got any good album recommendations for a newcomer to the genre?

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 1 points 9 hours ago

Fearofdark, only the greatest chiptune musician of our lives.

[–] PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

Gnome, Massive Hassle, and Barbarian Hermit mostly

[–] Ze_Rosie_Ro@lemmy.cafe -1 points 9 hours ago

I’ve been exclusively watching the Kendrick Lamar Super Bowl half time show. (Not exclusively exclusively, but might as well be.)