Using his house/property as a hazardous chemicals dumping site.
Asklemmy
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
Move to a red state. Put up an activity as harmful as possible to humans while keeping it legal and making sure to remember everyone at every moment that you are doing this because there are no regulations.
You can't convince a maga to stop voting trump with words, but you can force them if their only other option is dying for the lack of regulations.
So your solution is to sow more division by believing people who vote Republican are stupid? The same people who believe you are stupid for voting Democrat (or anyone else)? Interesting....
Maybe target the real problem: the system and the people who uphold it. Otherwise you are just a pawn of the wealthy.
Those regulations exist for a reason. Be the reason.
I don't mean "do the thing", make it clear to them why the thing was banned. If you don't know, look into your history books.
Like how Stephen Colbert setup his own SuperPac on air, showing how many ridiculous and unethical things are legal with US' current campaign finance laws.
To be fair, not all reasons are good.
They said unethical
Technically unaliving is unethical.
Unaliving a nazi who wants thousands or even millions of people death is unethical? I'm going to disagree.
You can say killing, or assassinating.
Perhaps you should limit yourself to reddit and .world.
Organizing, same as it always was.
I've spent a career in places with very little rule of law or effective governance.
The only thing that can give you a sliver of hope is to physically be close to a community that is tight-knit and competent homesteaders. This is African village rules. Force and money are all that matters. Life is cheap. Food is scarce and untrustworthy unless you farm it yourself. Cities are nightmares of abuse with pockets for the super-wealthy behind walls.
Real life examples like Lagos are hard to explain to Americans. Parable of the Sower gets close and is a book worth a read.
Such a good book
I was going to say armed insurrection, but on second thought that might be ethical under those circumstances.
Unethically probably the most gain could be in manufacturing fake medicine. Cheap inputs, expensive prices.
Ah, in fact, even better for repeat customers: Making real medicine and selling the hard stuff over the counter (assuming drug schedules are "regulation").
Yea, organized resistance is both ethical and the only real option that isn't nihilism.
That's already a thing it's called homeopathic medicine
Fair point, but without regulations your claims can be way wilder, and you don't have to make stuff safe to ingest anymore. Overall I think quackery can become even more profitable.
(homeopathy) n. a complementary therapy based on the theory that βlike cures likeβ. It involves treating a condition with a tiny dose of a substance that in larger doses would normally cause or aggravate that condition.
No, I think they mean actual medicine my guy, based on science. If itβs βhomeopathicβ and it works, we just call it medicine.
Sell meth to Musk's gang? Get them hooked.
Rhymes with squeegee.
Call the BeeGees?
Create a buisness in the US to facilitate any illegal activity you want, but physically leave the country for your safety
Be musk
Be Luigi