this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
20 points (95.5% liked)

Privacy Guides

17400 readers
73 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Whatsapp is privacy invasive, and we likely know that even when using E2EE, this is possible due to metadata tracking.

An easy way to avoid one creepy thing, contact scanning and the creation of "who knows whom" social nets, is to not grant apps permission to your contacts!

But this is not easy, as apps often enforce this, just as they do with

  • embedded cameras instead of using the system camera
  • embedded galleries instead of the 2 available portals (but Google will soon forbid that)
  • asking for unneeded permissions

Only GrapheneOS also allows blocking these permissions

  • sensors
  • internet
  • loading code from memory i.e. from the internet (why would they do that? Is there something they want to hide?)
  • debugging their own code to spy on the system behavior

But this app can help everyone on any Android to at least fix this :)

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Genghis@monero.town 1 points 22 hours ago

I'd rather just use the contact scope feature in GrapheneOS.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Highly recommended to just not use this app vs. trying to bypass malicious features.

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What is that suppose to mean?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It means by using this app you're bypassing malicious features but still using malicious software.

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not life. You can choose to use software that isn't malicious.

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No not if you arent in a position where people you need to contact dont use it lol

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Inform those people that you don't use it, and inform them of the alternatives. Boom, problem solved.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

it is really not solved if it's not about people wanting to reach OP, but OP needing to reach other people, like those at work

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Thing about Whatsapp is, you need a phone number to contact them. And that phone number works just as well for calling and SMS. So yes, it is.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 15 hours ago

well, you have a point. mandatory work group chats are still a question, but this may solve the majority of the problem

[–] pipes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

There's also "Open in Whatsapp" which has been around for 5 years, I've used it for all this time actually, I stopped giving Whatsapp access to my contacts around the time I was degoogling, plus I keep it installed in the work profile (Shelter), where I purposefully don't sync my personal addressbook. So this type of apps is very handy for a couple different scenarios:

  • you need to contact someone you have no interest in saving the contact of forever (plumber, guy on craigslist, etc)
  • you want to contact a person you haven't talked to in a long while (otherwise you could just search their name within whatsapp) of which you have the number somewhere else

All in all you save time mostly, and potentially give a little less to Meta.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

embedded galleries instead of the 2 available portals (but Google will soon forbid that)

Is it not using the portal? I thought it was since I'm able to choose every picture without granting media access to WhatsApp

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting, wasnt in the past, that means they are faster than Signal LOL

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 1 points 1 day ago

Ah so it is! And yeah, Signal not having it is such a pain