this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
242 points (94.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27799 readers
1392 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please state in which country your phrase tends to be used, what the phrase is, and what it should be.

Example:

In America, recently came across "back-petal", instead of back-pedal. Also, still hearing "for all intensive purposes" instead of "for all intents and purposes".

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

breaked vs broke

Respect the irregular verbs

[–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

People who pleaded guilty need to plead the fifth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

It's always going to be the "of" people. Its "would have", "should have" etc and not "would of".

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Also, if you wish you had done something differently then it's "wish I had" not "wish I would have".

[–] Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Wished'I'd've

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

About 1 in 3 posters here say “loose” when they mean “lose”

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

That triggers me lol

Don't forget:

brake vs break

waist vs waste

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

You don't feel "nauseous" you feel "nauseated".

EDIT: TIL "nauseous" can be used in place of "nauseated". This usage has been common since the 20th century.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 12 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Online in general: using "reductio ad absurdum" as a fallacy.

It's a longstanding logical tool. Here's an example of how it works: let's assume you can use infinity as a number. In that case, we can do:

∞ + 1 = ∞

And:

∞ - ∞ = 0

Agreed? If so, then:

∞ - ∞ + 1 = ∞ - ∞

And therefore:

1 = 0

Which is absurd. If we agree that all the logical steps to get there are correct, then the original premise (that we can use infinity as a number) must be wrong.

It's a great tool for teasing out incorrect assumptions. It has never been on any academic list of fallacies, and the Internet needs to stop saying otherwise. It's possible some other fallacy is being invoked while going through an argument, but it's not reductio ad absurdum.

[–] Classy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Well if we're going to be talking about logical fallacies, I feel like the string of arguments that you made there is a category error. Infinity isn't exactly a number, it's more of a philosophical concept than anything else. I would argue that trying to subtract Infinity from Infinity is illogical and kind of silly, but it wouldn't be a reductio ad absurdum as you put it, but instead a category error.

An absurdist argument might be more like, if I have one cat I can trade it for one dog. Therefore infinite cats can be traded for infinite dogs. This is obviously absurd, because infinite cats don't exist, unfortunately.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Or in math you'll talk about approaching infinity, that is just some arbitrarily large number.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

It's, "Excuse me, while I kiss the sky."

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

What entitlement means vs false sense of entitlement.

I tell people they are entitled to their rights and have an entitlement to their social security money for example, and they get offended thinking I mean "false sense of entitlement" instead.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

I hear "gaslighting" misused all of the time. It doesn't mean trying to persuade someone or just lying.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 28 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

This thread peaks my interest.

I hope my words piqued someone else’s interests more.

[–] Owljfien@lemm.ee 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

"Shoot that guy when he peaks the corner again"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Poop@lemmy.ca 21 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Using "racking" instead of the correct "wracking" in "wracking my brain". Not very common, but it annoys me... But not as much as "could of"... That is the worst, just stop it!

This is online and in person in Canada.

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 23 points 23 hours ago (17 children)

Niche is pronounced neesh and not nitch

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] konalt@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

People saying "exscape", "expresso", "pasghetti"

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Exspecially!

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 3 points 14 hours ago

"Give me a ghetto, you stupid French landlord!"

"Je n'ai pasghetti!"

(Pardon my French)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›