this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
116 points (98.3% liked)

Asklemmy

45407 readers
1067 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Greetings!

A friend of mine wants to be more secure and private in light of recent events in the USA.

They originally told me they were going to use telegram, in which I explained how Telegram is considered compromised, and Signal is far more secure to use.

But they want more detailed explanations then what I provided verbally. Please help me explain things better to them! ✨

I am going to forward this thread to them, so they can see all your responses! And if you can, please cite!

Thank you! ✨

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] qpsLCV5@lemmy.ml 81 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In my view, by far the biggest reason to switch is that Telegram doesn't end-to-end encrypt chats by default.

Yes you can start encrypted chats specifically, but i'll bet 99% of chats on telegram aren't encrypted - meaning whoever has access to the telegram servers can read all the messages.

Signal claims to end-to-end encrypt all chats by default, and if you want to be 100% sure you can in theory read the source code and compile the app yourself. this means signal cannot read any of your messages, even if police asks them to or servers get seized. That's a massive advantage in privacy.

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Additionally, E2E chats don't sync between devices (and iirc you can't use them on desktop at all), and group chats can't be encrypted at all.

[–] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was talking about Telegram. Syncing messages between devices has always been possible on Signal, just not the ones from before you connected the extra device.

[–] Lawn_and_disorder@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

There is also desktop clients for both.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Note that this is sent at time of syncing rather than being in an archive on the company’s server 24/7

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Telegram doesn't even encrypt group chats. And it doesn't encrypt private convos by default.

[–] logging_strict@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Then talk about coding. Non-techies curl up into a ball and die slightly inside as they run for the exits.

Highest form of encryption possible.

Try it

And if that is not enough to kill someones spirit and make them beg for mercy, recite random sections of the GNU Make documentation out of context and watch them go into convolutions.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 29 points 1 month ago (9 children)

While there may be better options out there, from a purely security standpoint.

The real world, with non-tech people needs solutions that are easy, fast and as close to foolproof as possible.

I choose Signal, because my mum, my sisters and brothers (none of which are tech people) can all go to their app stores and install Signal, it works and it is easy. Signal is private BY DEFAULT, I don't have to remind them to turn on security for each chat, there is voice and video chat for individuals and groups, I can use it to send files. It is really good. Secure communication is their primary goal.

I have been using Signal since it was called TextSecure and I only had one contact using it.

Yes it sucked when they dropped SMS support; but these days about 98% of my messaging goes through Signal. Any SMS is usually from my doctor/dentist/bank.

I never really trusted Telegram, too many compromises. Secure communication is not their primary goal.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] zzx@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Telegram rolls their own crypto. That should be the biggest red flag by far. I say this as a telegram user

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The encryption method they use was made up by them, and the chats aren't even end to end encrypted by default. Which I would argue is a larger red flag.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] logging_strict@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Signal pretends not to.

I prefer Telegram's honesty.

We are Telegram and we are here to help. And to make it more fun we will send all your communications to Russia for a change.

Oh man! Where do i sign up /nosarc

[–] juli@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Telegram for random public chatter/file storage(with password lock), talking to strangers without giving them your number. Signal for personal/private conversations.

Spread your data (encrypted or not) around, so a single entity doesn't own your digital life. Your device can handle 2 apps and don't give them permissions willy nilly. Geez, every one of these posts just wants to start a flame war.

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

Signal supports username based chatting.

[–] logging_strict@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In Telegram, you never have to expose your phone number. If you like walking into traps then of course you can.

But can make minimal efforts to not be a degenerate avoiding this obvious easily avoidable trap.

How to avoid exposing your phone number

Make a group called i'm not a complete utter idiot. Whenever you have a friend wanting to connect, make a group link, send it to them, have them join. After joining have them send a message in the group. Just, "Hi". Nothing more. Less is more.

Look for that message and click on the person's name. You are now connected. Send them a personal message, "Hi!".

You can also add them as a contact without sharing your phone number.

Your friend will probably be a degenerate and expose their phone number. Teach them how to go into settings to always hide it.

Try not to call them a degenerate, degenerates hate that.

Also try not to think of them as a degenerate, they will already know that and be proud of it and not understand why you don't share their enthusiasm.

So control what thoughts you project into the ether. If you have to change the topic in your mind to something involving flowers singing birds and clouds.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a neat trick, thanks for sharing

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stomata@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Telegram is not end to end encrypted. Repeating it's not. Only private mode or something like that is.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It really depends on who your friend is, and who they are trying to defenf against.

If the US ( or Russian / Chinese) government really wants to access an internet-connected device, they can do it; what app you are using doesn't even matter. For example, most people use the default Google keyboard, which could be compromised.

If the concern is about local goons / employers / coworkers, then both Telegram and Signal are more than enough to stop them prying.

As for whether to use Signal or Telegram, Signal has end to end encryption enabled by default, while in Telegram you have to switch it on for each chat. On the other hand, Telegram has the best UI among messaging apps hands down.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Even if you switch to an offline keyboard, the new "ai" assistants in Windows, iOS, and Android? Can read your screen, microphone, and etc. I'm not really sure what you should use unless you use coded language. Even then, there's just too much information about you out there anyway. Best bet would to be have conversations in private away from any electronic devices or use something like tails.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pegasus really negates a lot of security too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gayhitler@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There’s a lot of answers itt but heres a simpler one:

If you want to prevent people in power from having access to communications there are two methods employed, broadly speaking:

The first is to make a very secure, zero knowledge, zero trust, zero log system so that when the authorities come calling you can show them your empty hands and smirk.

Signal doesn’t actually do this, but they’re closer to this model than the second one I’m about to describe. Bear in mind they’re a us company so when the us authorities come to their door or authorities from some nation the us has a treaty with come to their door signal is legally required to comply and provide all the information they have.

The second is to simply not talk to the authorities. Telegram was closer to this model than signal, using a bunch of different servers in nations with wildly different extradition and information sharing mechanisms in order to make forcing them to comply with some order Byzantine to the point of not being worth it.

Eventually the powers that be got their shit together and put hands on telegrams owner so now they’re complying with all lawful orders and a comparison of the tech is how you’d pick one.

The technology behind the two doesn’t matter really but default telegram is less “secure” than default imessage (I was talking with someone about it so it’s on the old noggin’).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fake4000@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

The fact that telegram operates in a country that scores 18/100 on global freedom and 30/100 on internet freedom.

https://freedomhouse.org/country/united-arab-emirates

[–] flux@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm not an expert but I'll use this analogy.

Signal is you meeting a person who gives you secure devices. This person then can only ever provide the following information to someone else. From Signal website. "The phone number. the date and time a user registered with Signal and the last date of a user's connectivity to the Signal service." Only your device and your friends device can read the messages. It goes direct from you to them. The only way to read any message is having the device.

Telegram is like you making an agreement with another person. By default messages are encrypted but go to the other person for decryption before going to your friends device. This other person Telegram has and will give the phone number, messages, serverlogs, dates to legal entities by request. Now there is an option to bypass this person by using "secret chats" . This will make it so the message is directly from your device to their device. Telegram can't read messages but as I understand they can still potentially have metadata, server logs of when messages are sent, how many, what device they are sent from. Bottomline is they have activity logs Signal can only provide the date you signed up and the last time you used the app. Not only that but just being on the Telegram platform which allows bots makes you a target. Bots will contact you like spam. Sending you harmful links, etc.

Almost every security person I've ever read says. "I use Signal". Why wouldn't you go with the service that by default has end to end encryption? Telegram makes it a option you have to select for each person. Both use your phone number.

These are very basic descriptions. I'm Happy to remove or update if I got anything wrong.

More signal encryption info

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 4 weeks ago

With Signal, the key to encrypt your messages are on your device, and is never sent to the company.

Signal, and anyone who hacks them, or governments that attack them, cannot read your messages. This has been proven in court.

With Telegram, the key to encrypt your messages are on their server.

Telegram, and anyone who hacks them, or governments that attack them, can read all of your messages. This has also been proven in court.

[–] gazby@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I won't be popular in this thread, but I don't fight this battle anymore. Telegram beats Signal in virtually every aspect of user experience. If a person is unlikely to be convinced that e2ee is worth taking all the UX hits, I don't try anymore.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I keep seeing this claim, but I may be too much of a computer nerd to notice when using them both. What does Telegram do better and how?

[–] gazby@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I may be too much of a computer nerd to notice when using them both

That's probably true of just about everyone on Lemmy.

What does Telegram do better and how?

User experience, like I said. How many less technically inclined people do you know who will understand why they have no message history in Signal after moving devices? Yes, they could have kept it if they'd had backups enabled and moved the archive over and restored from it, but it's too late now, their entire contact list has been notified that their safety number's changed (another aspect we get to attempt to explain). It's a bummer.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Message history is a valid point. Signal just announced they're fixing it.

Safety number change notifications are probably necessary to maintain Signal's high level of security. The above device linking improvements should make them less frequent, though I'll concede some might consider that a worse UX than an insecure chat with no such notifications.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does it though? I have used both and I vastly prefer my experience on signal. I don't really engage with the like, "communities" aspect of telegram though so perhaps thats what I'm missing?

[–] gazby@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nope, see my reply to sibling for a more complete example

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Telegrsm is not secure anymore. USA have all the keys of the encriptions of telegrsm.

[–] doomsdayrs@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't say USA has all the encryption keys, but the fact that it is actually possible to have a backdoor is reason enough for me to not use it. Signal complies with all search warrants, giving all the data they have to law enforcement. They have never given any data to law enforcement, because they do not have access to it. Telegrams approach is to simply to spread the data to several servers in different countries, so if law enforcement wanted access they'd have to submit requests to each country (some of which wouldn't comply).

load more comments
view more: next ›