this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
328 points (94.3% liked)

Science Memes

11859 readers
3101 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 91 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Here's a version without the bad crop, comedy homicide, pointless circle around the punchline, and puritanical censoring

[–] LordTrychon@startrek.website 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In his essay "To Tell a Chemist" (1965), Asimov proposed a simple shibboleth for distinguishing chemists from non-chemists: ask the person to read the word "unionized". Chemists, he noted, will read un-ionized (electrically neutral), while non-chemists will read union-ized (belonging to a trade union).

[–] waz@feddit.uk 3 points 5 days ago

Or some will say it’s spelled incorrectly

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago

If you don't think about it very hard, solidarity is basically macro ionization

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 6 days ago
[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 days ago

Ah, because of the ions.

Took me eons.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

My initial thought was "would chemists theoretically be less into labor protections than plumbers"?

I guess that puts me in a third bucket.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Am a chemist in your group. I read it the plumber way too. Took me several seconds to get it.

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Good luck finding the chemistry teacher, though.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

As a leftist chemistry teacher, I read it as "having attained union", rather than "not ionized", so YMMV with this heuristic

ETA: (also, yeah, I have excellent job security until all public schools are abolished in the US)

[–] ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

What about ChemE then? They're both. Sort of. Okay maybe they're not chemists, but... chemistry-adjacent.