this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

46115 readers
216 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] David_Eight@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago
[–] Alice@beehaw.org 0 points 7 hours ago

I get the point but "criminal" isn't a moral label. Cops are monsters even if they don't break the law. Similarly, if Luigi did it, that means he committed a crime but it still doesn't make him the villain.

[–] roux@hexbear.net 0 points 7 hours ago

I still think it's fucking hilarious that they tried to make him look like National Threat No. 1 but ended up creating one of the most badass photos of 2024 instead.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

You can agree with the justice of what he did, but Luigi did, in fact, commit 1st degree murder. That's a crime.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

No. Luigi didn't shoot Brian Thompson. The police are lying.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like a delusional belief to me.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 0 points 6 hours ago

Sounds like you're into guilty until proven innocent, which is pretty warped.

[–] hamid@vegantheoryclub.org 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, you are from the future when his trial occurred and he was found guilty?

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

I am not a court. I don't have to have a trial to believe in somebody's guilt. According to the evidence I have seen it appears he shot a man to death.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 0 points 5 hours ago

They are, by law, innocent until proven guilty. The “evidence” you have seen is certainly not all the evidence, and your beliefs have been swayed before defense can make an argument.

I sure as hell hope you never serve on a jury.

[–] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 5 hours ago

no investigation no right to speak

[–] hamid@vegantheoryclub.org 0 points 6 hours ago

You don't know anything other than what lying American police told you and lying American media reported they said. You have absolutely no evidence or have any knowledge of his guilt or innocence. It appears that way to you because liars told you and now you are repeating it to me like an obedient dog.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

He shot a man to death who killed thousands. He's a vigilante if anything.

[–] Micromot@feddit.org 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

He still commited a crime which makes him a criminal which is just a fact and has nothing to do with the crime being justified

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What makes someone "criminal" as a quality? Breaking the law? Killing people? Are all health insurance workers criminals too?

[–] Micromot@feddit.org 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Commiting a crime makes you a criminal, so if you break a law you are a criminal. And if the decisions of health insurance workers are also breaking laws they are criminals too.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Then if you have ever gone faster than the speed limit, you are a criminal. That makes most people in the developed world criminals.

That aside, the point is that naming someone a criminal has moralistic baggage, and by saying that anyone that breaks laws is a criminal thus immoral, you imply all laws are inherently moral.

[–] Micromot@feddit.org 0 points 6 hours ago

That is indeed true, although then it is a pretty subjective label

[–] M68040@hexbear.net 0 points 9 hours ago

The world needs more Robin Hoods and Ishikawa Goemon. Given increasing inequity and corruption without any real hope at a systemic level, Material conditions are right for the return of the outlaw hero, I think.