this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

46385 readers
111 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not to forget the third category: dumb luck

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's the right half! (Dumb people getting rich without head start is incredibly rare)

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree there should only be two categories, but I think "birth lottery" should be a subset of "dumb luck," not the other way around.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I cannot think of many dumb people who got rich by themselves. Unless they win the actual lottery instead of the birth lottery

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

"Dumb luck" doesn't imply the person is dumb, just that the quality of their decision-making had no bearing on their success. Even geniuses can have dumb luck.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Unless they win the actual lottery

Not only overwhelming most of lotteries winnings, while looking good to us bareass paupers, are pittance compared to wealth of people who are rich, but also people winning lotteries lack the foundations rich need to remains rich (second chart) and usually lose everything pretty fast.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Behind the Bastards covers a few of them. IIRC Dr. Oz grew up poor and went to medical school on scholarship.

He's not fuck you money rich like Bezos or Musk, both of which lucked into the birth lottery.

Though tbf, Oz got rich by scamming people out of their money with endorsing supplements that don't work.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Becoming a surgeon and serial scammer sounds like he lacked morals not intelligence.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 weeks ago

morals are a flaw on an individual level and only remotely beneficial in the context of greater society, intelligence is something you can never have enough of.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago

I think sports is where it’s most common. People who weren’t born rich but had the genes, drive, and luck to get into the sport in the first place can get pretty rich when they get to the highest level of competition.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That's what's the original says. It was made back in 2011

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Probably because luck actually plays little role in being rich. Without luck those born rich will still be rich. With luck those born poor will still be poor.

[–] bali10050@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The „merciless exploitation of the working class” is not how they get rich, but how they keep their wealth. If you're poor, you can't really exploit the working class. It's basically just birth lottery with a really really small section for the people with luck and/or hard work.

[–] coolie4@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If you're poor, you can't really exploit the working class.

Of course you can. It's called turning to crime. Most pimps, low level drug dealers, etc, aren't rich.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 0 points 4 weeks ago

You just listed service industry workers

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 0 points 4 weeks ago

If you're poor, you can't really exploit the working class.

Scammers from across the planet have entered the chat.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 weeks ago

If you’re poor, you can’t really exploit the working class.

Tell that to the po-lice

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 weeks ago
[–] dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Thing is, you obviously can become reasonably wealthy by following the first chart, if you're talented and 1 in 10 thousand lucky, whereas the second chart has a significant success rate.

The mega rich are too weak-willed to concede they've essentially hit a 1 in 60 million Powerball. Winning the lottery warrants glee, not pride.

Billionaires all exploit the working class—or at the very least they all inherently rely on its occurrence, without exception.

I'd add a third slice to the second pie: steal your way there.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago

I'd add a third slice to the second pie: steal your way there.

That is expliotation of working class

[–] rustyricotta@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 weeks ago

To make the odds in your favor even worse, all your competitors have an existing fortune and ARE exploiting the workforce. Good luck 👍

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Read a study earlier that stated that the majority of high corporate execs are most likely psychopaths

[–] uis@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago

I think it's the other way around: only psychopaths can become corporate execs

[–] minyaen@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 weeks ago

Are you sure it wasn't sociopath? It does take a certain amount of decision-making lacking empathy or remorse.

[–] xelar@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The youngest billionaire becomes one after inheriting a fortune.

[–] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

If that's not pulling yourself up by the bootstraps, well then I don't know what is.

[–] gsymon@mstdn.social 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

@Confidant6198

Hmmm... I think you could squeeze in tax-evasion and money-laundering.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago

You first need something to evade or launder.