this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
39 points (68.2% liked)

Asklemmy

44380 readers
1353 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 43 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

When you rent a domicile to someone you are responsible for guaranteeing their private use and enjoyment of the domicile without undie restrictions for the term of the agreement.

If somebody films in the domicile, it's none of lessor's business. Do you think every talking head YouTuber who films a talking head piece from a hotel needs to get approval from the hotel? How about ticktokers? What about people doing personal video calls with there family?

No, it would be a unreasonable burden for someone's quiet enjoyment of their domicile to not be able to film.

As stipulated in the posters question there is no legally actionable recourse to a landlord for just filming in the location.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

AieBnB owners can set a guest limit, and I'd have to imagine saying a max of (to pick a random number) ten guests isn't an unreasonable burden, so in that hypothetical... but I'm guessing that particular AirBnB owner didn't put a guest limit in place, so all they can really do is pursue extra cleanup charges if applicable.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 10 points 4 weeks ago

I'm pretty sure, in private residential transactions, breaching a policy or rule is not grounds for a lawsuit, it may be grounds for terminating the lease. But assuming this person has vacated the property by the time it was discovered, it's a moot issue

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

right but OP's post title asks, "can you press charges ... for filming"

Objects don't have rights, people do. You can require your consent to be in a monetized video, but a house doesnt have consent to give haha. If you don't want someone filming the inside of your property, don't allow them in. Especially don't ask them to pay you to come in.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world -1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Remind me of the words immediately after "they'll be filming"?

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't be angry at me, you're the one who focused on the wrong words. It was one sentence my guy, all you had to do was read it to the end. Lol. Have a day 🫱

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Right back at ya king. It was one sentence, all you had to do was read it to the end.

[–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

without undie restrictions

Nice.

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 42 points 4 weeks ago

If you don't want people fucking in your property, don't rent out your property. Seems pretty simple to me.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 36 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Next record is 1000/24h.

Now let us drop the euphemistic language.

There are 1440 minutes in a day. To achieve the stunt of having sex with 1000 men in that window, that implies a 1,44 minutes time slot. Which implies she will have to "service" more than one man at a time.

This woman is risking severe physical, mental and emotional trauma.

Hasn't this bad experience left a bad enough memory to dissuade from another attempt?

I remember reading a cover on the world largest gang bang orgy and the event had to be stopped because the women risked vaginal tearing.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 27 points 4 weeks ago

β€œI know people won’t understand why I do this,” Lily said. β€œBut this is my journey, and I’m learning more about myself with each step even when it’s hard.”

To each their own. It wouldn't be for me, but this is something she wants to do, that's up to her.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 21 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

From the article it reads 100 was quite traumatic for her already... why she intends to push further is beyond me

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 4 weeks ago

Honestly I don't get it either. I think she needs professional mental health care immediately or we shouldn't feel bad for her tears as they aren't real. I hope we don't have to feel bad for her but I am afraid that she needs help, a lot of it.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

Mental illness.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

mooooooooooooooooooooooney.

and

faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaame

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

didnt she already do the 1000 in 24 hours?

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 weeks ago

Don't know.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 23 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Press charges? Like criminal charges? Not in the US.

I suspect she could get banned from Airbnb for making essentially a porn video without the host's consent.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 20 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Then again, is it illegal to film yourself in privacy (only talking about AirBnB renting here, the rest is a horror story that has nothing to do with renting an apartment).

Sounds like USA religious prudism / click bait.

Edit: the number of airbnb bootlickers...

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I believe a business is supposed to get permission from the Airbnb host for any commercial filming. Whether it's a reality show, a TV commercial, or adult entertainment.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

In London or the USA (or elsewhere)?

[–] _LordMcNuggets_@feddit.org 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Let's say UK, since it was filmed there for example. I mean surely the Airbnb owners have a good case right?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Against what exactly, fucking and filming?

I mean if they destroyed something, sure, but having sex? The mattress in a popular AirBnB have probably seen more jizz&dicks than than that.

[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It's likely against policy for having parties, and if they're filming for commercial purposes, there's likely a policy against commercial use of the property. The stay is intended for the amount of people that were indicated when reserving the place.

Suing would likely be mainly for cleaning costs, and perhaps replacing some items? Not sure how much compensation they would get beyond that.

Using a private property for commercial use, and then saying it can't be used for commercial use? I'd find that hard to believe.

[–] _LordMcNuggets_@feddit.org 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Thanks, yes - this is what I was looking for. Just thinking from a Airbnb renter perspective, such a stunt would drop the value of the property + service fees such as changing the mattresses etc.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

Because of the scale of it I guess, but people rent AirBnBs and fuck all the time, so hard to make that illegal I think.

Also, maybe the value would go up, who knows, but if it did, nobody would claim the actress should have a cut right?

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago

The article says nothing whatsoever about this topic.

[–] DeceasedPassenger@lemmy.world 22 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 weeks ago

Howso? I'd be honored to be smashed by 101 weiners in an AirBNB.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago

I feel like this shouldn't even be a post here. Maybe in a news community, as this links to a story, but not AskLemmy of all places.

I would hope not. Provide the value and make sure the apartment is clean for the next renter. No one limits your time to clean.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago

Many film makers use location releases signed by the owner of the establishment for this reason. Example: https://www.dmacinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/location-recording-permission-form.pdf

In many cases the location owner still has the right to the location in your video. There's also many countries with laws where you are simply not allowed to act commercially out of a rented room. There are also many countries where porn or sexual performances like these require preregistered locations and extra licensing (besides the countries where it's banned completely).

I'm not familiar with the rules of the UK. But in my country you can sue if they rented it as a normal consumer without sharing the intent.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 weeks ago

Feelings about AirBnB aside, it's kind of a dick move to create a potential biohazard for someone else (I highly doubt the area was properly sanitized, and I highly doubt 100+ dudes are all going to be clean).

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 2 points 4 weeks ago

Why do you ask ?