this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
107 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

59566 readers
4696 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
107
Apple's mobile browser policies and Google pact are 'holding back innovation,' UK regulator says | TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)
submitted 9 hours ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

An inquiry group setup by the U.K.’s antitrust authority has provisionally found that Apple’s policies are “holding back innovation in the browsers we use to access the web on mobile phones.”

While the report focuses substantively on Apple, it also highlighted a revenue-sharing agreement with Google, noting that the duo “earn significant revenue” when Google Chrome is used on iOS, which reduces their “financial incentives to compete.” 

The announcement comes in the same week as the Department of Justice (DoJ) in the U.S. said that Google should divest its Chrome browser, after a judge ruled in August that the internet giant was tantamount to an illegal monopoly on online search.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago

Good that they're starting to pay attention to this.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

They seem to be mostly upset about Apple requiring browsers on iOS to use Webkit instead of implementing their own backend. Which is yet another problem the UK wouldn't have if they'd stayed in the EU, where that's already been dealt with under the DMA.