this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
77 points (95.3% liked)

Fediverse

28475 readers
553 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have seen many comments saying that lemmy.world sucks, and sh.itjust.works is good. I have seen that lemmy.world apparently has a very poor reputation among other instances. Why? After a quick look, sh.itjust.works doesn't look much different to me. Can anyone explain?

Edit: many good replies. the conclusion I'm drawing is that for my purposes it doesn't really matter. I appreciate everyone who responded

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The two main reasons people attack LW is:

  1. people who criticise it because it is by far the largest instance, and thereby means lemmy isn’t as decentralised as it could be, I think this is a fair point, because it has caused federation issues with for example aussie.zone in the past.

  2. Tankies who get mad the average lemmy.world user does not share their admiration for China, Russia, North Korea, Stalin, and Mao. Thereby accusing the whole instance of being “libs” and “bigots”.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 5 points 7 hours ago

because it has caused federation issues with for example aussie.zone in the past.

Just to precise, it's still the case

[–] rowdyrockets@lemm.ee 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’ll add 2 more that resonate with me:

  1. Discussions of distributing copyright material is banned. (Not actually sharing, obviously that is illegal, but they’ve banned the mere discussion of it.)
  2. They have not defederated from Meta’s Threads
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fwiw, LW seems ready to defederate from Threads at a moment's notice (post), but atm it doesn't matter since Threads isn't federating with Lemmy anyway.

Though it's still an excellent point to wonder why they haven't done it preemptively, like pretty much every other instance I've heard of (even lemm.ee's [blocked instance list[(https://lemm.ee/instances) that is shockingly short has that one). Perhaps bc the decision to defederate from any instance, and especially that one, has generated such negative feedback (as the post linked above mentions), they are hesitant to do anything at all, especially again while it does not matter right now.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The way they approached Threads is part of why I stuck with LW. Instance location doesn't matter much to me and why would I go with an option that is more willing to take choice out of my hands?

Corporate or not, it should be my decision to interact with it. Unless it's Nazis or some shit similar, I can block rather than rely on defederation and being told what to do.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 4 hours ago

Well, I hear that but at the same time the counterargument seems fairly strong. As I understand it (not being a mod of any communities here myself) apparently the mod tools suck pretty bad, especially across instance barriers. And in particular it is reportedly lacking standard filtering capabilities so that if Threads were ever federated with, the sheer VOLUME of content would quickly overwhelm the ability of the mods to keep up. Hence, if Threads were to join the Threadiverse, then Lemmy as it currently is now would have no chance but would cease to exist, almost instantly. And we would become an unmoderated playground.

I have no idea how Threads itself handles moderation, but at a guess, it wouldn't (fully?) apply if people with Threads accounts were to comment on posts in Lemmy communities?

So Threads really is a special circumstance, not at all like federating with hexbear or exploding heads etc.

Even so, the admins do seem to be listening to the feedback of the users, rather than forcing that choice upon everyone, yeah:-).

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 97 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Here's the description by both:

sh.itjust.works:

A bilingual (EN/FR) general-purpose instance located in eastern Canada! Powered by 99% renewable energy! Everyone is welcome eh.

Lemmy.World:

A generic Lemmy server for everyone to use. (...) Lemmy.World is a general-purpose Lemmy instance of various topics, for the entire world to use

The comments about instances being "good" or "bad" is just plain ol' tribalism.

Users get attacked for the instances they registered to, even if they were unaware of instance politics when they actually registered. That sucks!

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Lemmy world has more users and therefore more likely to have more jerks when the jerk to not jerk ratio within an instance is the same.

There are/were a few instances where staying with their registration is worthy of assuming the worst about them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

sh.itjust.works has a much funnier name.

can't argue with that!

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 54 points 2 days ago (24 children)

I agree with you. IMO, it's not that different.

The big difference is between the tankie LARPer instances (lemmygrad, hexbear, parts of lemmy.ml) and the rest of the major instances.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (16 children)

.world is the instance where most new users default to so and it has the highest user base and that includes a lot of trolls or just bad faith actors. Also, a lot of .world is based from reddit users who left and they brought that kind of mindset along. Some people don't like that either.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

I have seen that lemmy.world apparently has a very poor reputation among other instances.

It's the largest by far, with five times the monthly active population of #2. One of the main things people want out of federated systems is decentralization, and having one huge dominant server goes against that goal.

I should note .world wasn't the biggest when I signed up. I picked it because mastodon.world was a known quantity, which led me to believe the same team would run a stable server.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They are just two different servers. Lemmy.World is one of the really big ones. I had an account there but because of the size there were a lot of performance issues. I would recommend you join one of the smaller servers like sh.itjust.works. You have access to almost all the same information on the Fediverse.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 days ago (8 children)

You'll miss out on the Beehaw community on Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works, since Beehaw defederated from them

Lemmy.cafe is a nice general purpose instance that only defederates from the most extreme instances, while still giving access to Beehaw and all other instances. It's still small too, so it'd more effectively spread the load compared to creating an account on sh.itjust.works, which already has a pretty huge user count.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

You’ll miss out on the Beehaw community

Beehaw seems completetly dead to me, there's only ever a handful of comments on posts.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 hours ago

They still have a little over 300 Monthly active users, which puts it in line with my own instance. So not huge, but certainly not dead.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

They have really heavy handed moderation

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

shit has the same or better level of infrastructure for a smaller user base

load more comments
view more: next ›