Technology

59651 readers

2691 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

159

Palo Alto Networks confirms mystery zero day now exploited: No patch, no CVE (www.thestack.technology)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 85 points 1 week ago (5 children)

with the US-based security vendor on November 11 urging customers to pull their management interfaces off the public internet or restrict them to known IP addresses.

Why would you EVER put management interfaces on the public internet? What terrible decisions led them down that path? VPN is so quick and easy at a minimum.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The network gear I manage is only accessible via VPN, or from a trusted internal network...

...and by the gear I manage, I mean my home network (a router and a few managed switches and access points). If a doofus like me can set it up for my home, I'd think that actual companies would be able to figure it out, too.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know right, 99% of these caves are against management interfaces too

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago

Paleo Alto?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

Management interfaces shouldn't even be accessible from the general LAN.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Once I read this I just stopped lol. You almost deserve to be explored if you do this, this is like security 101.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

zero trust?

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/ → Leader in Cybersecurity Protection & Software for the Modern Enterprises - Palo Alto Networks

Thanks, I will avoid them.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They're spamming all web logs too with an advertisement for their services in the user agent. I decided to ban them from all my websites because the logs took up too much space.

[–] mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah fuck them.

[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

lmao that's not an ad, dude.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're saying who they are, what they do, and are linking to their website and sometimes sends hundreds of requests in a minute. It might not say "For only €49.99 you can get your very own thing!”, but that does not mean they aren't throwing their name up in every website owner's arse whether they like it or not.

[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's so you know who is scanning you.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 5 points 1 week ago

That could have been done by just having a single entry called GoogleBot or BingBot, not an entire sentence explaining their product offering let alone hundreds of times a minute.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

"urging customers to pull their management interfaces off the public internet or restrict them to known IP addresses."

Sounds more like pebkac and less of a big deal. Management interface should be in your management VLAN, plus I don't know another vendor that can touch them in terms of security features.