this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
579 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

58424 readers
4654 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link: https://archive.ph/PgtUk

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I legitimately do not have enough space on my phone to install all the crappy bloatware of all the stores I go to. They quite literally ask the impossible of me.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I have yet to see an app that does something a website could not do...

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago

Harvest data more efficiently for our corporate overlords :)

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 hours ago

One big supermarket chain here has an app where you get a few cents bonus discount on already discounted items with the app coupon. The in-store announcement praises it as the first place of some insitute's supermarket app ranking. Even if that institute were legit, the ranking fair and the spot well-deserved, I always felt like that's a competition with no winners.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 51 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

TBH I dont use an app for anything that can be done in the browser, especially when mobile websites ask me tl get their app.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 13 points 5 hours ago

I'm the same way. The less apps there are on my phone, the better. Also, using the web app is the only way to block ads on certain sites such as Instagram or Twitter.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

then there are companies like yelp who disable their mobile site and make their desktop site as shitty as possible on mobile to force you to the app.

[–] MrOtherGuy@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Doesn't really sound like a company that I would want to do any business with then.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I actually often prefer using apps over websites, because my phone is quite slow and using a browser is often way slower than an app.

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 22 points 4 hours ago

Particularly since some companies have made their websites intentionally shit so that you'd be encouraged to use the app instead. I noticed that with out local flavour of door dash, where the website got slower and clunkier and generally more shit right around the same time that the "Use our app!" banners got more obnoxious.

[–] doctortran@lemm.ee 47 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

I recently re-downloaded the Michaels app while I was in the Michaels checkout line just so I could apply a $5 coupon that the register failed to read from the app anyway.

There's your problem right there.

Does this author not understand how dumb this makes him look? You downloaded an entire app for a $5 coupon on something you probably were overcharged for in the first place?

Even when you’re lacking in a store-specific app, your apps will let you pay by app. You just need to figure out (or remember, if you ever knew) whether your gardener or your hair salon takes Venmo, Cash App, PayPal, or one of the new bank-provided services such as Zelle and Paze.

If only there was a universal form of payment that you could keep in your pocket and pull out to use anytime with very minimal interaction. Maybe a card or something.

Apps are all around us now. McDonald’s has an app. Dunkin’ has an app.

Why are you using them?

Every chain restaurant has an app. Every food-delivery service too: Grubhub, Uber Eats, DoorDash, Chowbus.

Why are you using all of them??

Every supermarket and big-box store. I currently have 139 apps on my phone. These include: Menards, Home Depot, Lowe’s, Joann Fabric, Dierbergs, Target, IKEA, Walmart, Whole Foods

Why the fucking hell do you need any of these?!

This is literally the 2024 equivalent of your mother having a dozen toolbars in Internet Explorer because she kept clicking on coupons.

Just go to the place, pull out your credit card, pay the cashier, and leave. How the hell does any functioning adult blame the technology when they have this little self control?

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 hours ago

People who are proud of getting a good deal via an app break my heart. Most folks I know like that are not strapped for cash. They just like the feeling of getting a bargain. They don't consider that the prices are artificially inflated. They don't need the sale item. And in the long run they'll probably end up paying more when the stores know their purchasing habits and have A/B tested them enough to know how to provide as little as possible while charging as much as a customer can stomach.

If a coupon requires an app, I don't by that item. Especially when it comes to groceries. When it comes to store cards, most let you use a phone number instead of scanning the card. So plug in a random number at checkout. You can often get a hit on the first try. Then pay in cash. Dirty up someone else's data and give these stores nothing on you. Seriously, if people keep giving in, it's guaranteed to get worse. First the store card, then the app, what's next?

[–] nepenthes@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I stopped reading the article after it just became a list of apps. Felt like a thinly veiled ad, and if not, annoying af.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 6 hours ago

Honestly, if there were a simpler way to sell their personal data to retailers for people who want to do so, that probably would be more appealing for the users.

[–] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 hours ago

out of spite I don't use my phone to "play" on.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 22 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure anyone actually read the article, cuz yall are talkin about apps vs. web sites, and data collection. Two points which are briefly covered, but ultimately shrugged off in favor of the larger thesis:

Smartphones … meant [companies] could use their apps to off-load effort. … In other words, apps became bureaucratized. What started as a source of fun, efficiency, and convenience became enmeshed in daily life. Now it seems like every ordinary activity has been turned into an app, while the benefit of those apps has diminished.

I’d like to think that this hellscape is a temporary one. As the number of apps multiplies beyond all logic or utility, won’t people start resisting them? And if platform owners such as Apple ratchet up their privacy restrictions, won’t businesses adjust? Don’t count on it. Our app-ocalypse is much too far along already. Every crevice of contemporary life has been colonized. At every branch in your life, and with each new responsibility, apps will keep sprouting from your phone. You can't escape them. You won’t escape them, not even as you die, because—of course—there’s an app for that too.

It’s not simply the code delivery mechanism, and it’s not whether the data exchange is safe from prying eyes… It’s the fact that a digital UX has invaded every aspect of human interaction, including mourning.

[–] doctortran@lemm.ee 18 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

At every branch in your life, and with each new responsibility, apps will keep sprouting from your phone. You can't escape them. You won’t escape them, not even as you die, because—of course—there’s an app for that too.

Except that's just straight up not true. You can't escape it? You can't escape installing the Michaels app to get a $5 discount coupon?

I'm absolutely flabbergasted by what I'm reading here because I have no idea what the hell any of these people are doing in their lives where they're collecting this many apps out of necessity. This is entirely selection bias. They seem to be incapable of resisting the pull of trashy, useless apps, and insist the whole world is.

Nothing is stopping you from walking into any of these businesses, getting your purchase, paying with a card, and leaving.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Some stores require you to use the app for order pickup. Why they have the Menards app installed I have no clue. They've always been way behind with e-commerce, but their website works perfectly fine.

[–] MinFapper@startrek.website 3 points 3 hours ago

Some stores require you to use the app for order pickup.

Sounds like a store to avoid like the plague.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 320 points 14 hours ago (12 children)

You can do almost anything with a website that you could do with an app. The only reason they are pushing the apps so hard is because they can collect a lot more data than a website can.

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 157 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

As Cory Doctorow put it, "An app is just a web-page wrapped in enough IP to make it a felony to add an ad-blocker to it."

[–] doctortran@lemm.ee 30 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

The cloud is many things, but most of all, it's a trap. When software is delivered as a service, when your data and the programs you use to read and write it live on computers that you don't control, your switching costs skyrocket. Think of Adobe, which no longer lets you buy programs at all, but instead insists that you run its software via the cloud. Adobe used the fact that you no longer own the tools you rely upon to cancel its Pantone color-matching license. One day, every Adobe customer in the world woke up to discover that the colors in their career-spanning file collections had all turned black, and would remain black until they paid an upcharge:

The cloud allows the companies whose products you rely on to alter the functioning and cost of those products unilaterally. Like mobile apps – which can't be reverse-engineered and modified without risking legal liability – cloud apps are built for enshittification. They are designed to shift power away from users to software companies. An app is just a web-page wrapped in enough IP to make it a felony to add an ad-blocker to it. A cloud app is some Javascript wrapped in enough terms of service clickthroughs to make it a felony to restore old features that the company now wants to upcharge you for.

I legitimately want to scream sometimes as I feel the continual death of local computing and actual software, and it depresses me to no end how few businesses or users see it for what it is.

And it's exactly this: a trap. A trap users people are racing into, and they have no idea, at all, how bad it's going to get when the doors close behind them.

The rest of us are left with little recourse. Looking at the difference between Outlook and New Outlook is genuinely depressing because that's the future we're all being shepherded into against our will. I swear, in like 10 years, Windows will mostly just be a kiosk for Edge.

[–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago

Windows will mostly just be a kiosk for Edge.

I think for the vast majority of average users this has been true for a long time.

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago

I'm with you 100% up to the "little recourse," I think there's more options now than there have ever been. Open source (including linux and self hosting) are about the only tech-future things I'm genuinely excited about.

There's still a learning curve and progress to be made, for sure. However, anecdotally, I've seen programming and hosting become vastly more accessible in the last 15 years. Also, not everyone needs to self host, people just need to know someone who is willing and able to set them up.

Not saying it's a guarantee, but it's a possible way out, at least. And being here on lemmy, reading and writing about these issues is a good sign there's movement in the right direction.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 82 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This is the main reason why I seldom install anyone's "app".

Most of these apps aren't true apps anyway, they're just customized browsers that lead you to a website and are free to collect as much data from you and your phone as they want.

I'll go on your website first if I have to and 9 / 10 I get what I want. Besides, I'll only ever visit the service once or twice so I don't need to install a permanent app on my phone for that.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Also desktop mode to circumvent those phone detection systems and trying to force an app.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

I wish. Every fucking bank has their own shitty app for 2FA instead of just using standardized and proven TOTP, no way around that.

Same about school apps the article mentioned since it's connecting to their (one of many) proprietary system, no website for that.

And recently got into the home automation rabbit hole. Lots of devices that require their fucking app, sometimes with mandatory cloud account, just to connect! And people in reviews even praise how easy it is, it's infuriating! I don't need light bulbs connecting to the internet, thank you very much.

[–] wrekone@lemmyf.uk 19 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I get emails from school, with a link that opens a 3rd party app, which only displays a link that opens in the default browser. I've asked the school to just send me direct links to the announcements, but they say they can't. The site doesn't require authentication, but the URLs have UUIDs so I can't just guess what the link would be. The app is quite literally just a data exfiltration layer that does everything it can to make sure you can't bypass it. Good luck getting any other parents to give a shit though.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 hours ago

Good luck getting any other parents to give a shit though.

That's the big one, sadly.

[–] Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world 22 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ha, sucker, you think your non-Internet-connected lightbulbs make you safe? My Internet-connected lightbulbs have sent my online-car to wardrive your neighbourhood and sniff your Zigbee network!

…if you see my car please tell it to come back to me, I need to go to the shops…

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

Joke's on you - I can't even reach my Zigbee devices in the next room, your car won't have a chance from the street. That'll make it easier to convince it to come back home though.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 101 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

My favorite part of the 30 day dumb phone challenge I did recently: I couldn't install your crappy app even if I wanted to.

A little over halfway through the challenge, was paying for my order at a local eatery, and the cashier started plugging their new app and rewards points and digital coupons and shit. I was like "I'm gonna stop you right there: flip phone." and pulled it out of my pocket and brandished it like I was the sheriff of Luddite-ville.

Kinda like this, but "Flip phone!"

[–] doctortran@lemm.ee 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I was like "I'm gonna stop you right there: flip phone." and pulled it out of my pocket and brandished it like I was the sheriff of Luddite-ville.

I...is the implication you would have no other choice but to install their app if you didn't have a flip phone?

I'm baffled by these comments. Who the hell is actually listening to these people and installing apps on their phone just because a cashier mentioned it?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 59 points 14 hours ago (8 children)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 33 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (11 children)

That's what I used to do, but a good portion of the time they'd continue their spiel to try to change my mind. Have only had to brandish the dumb phone once, but so far it's got a 100% shut down success rate.

[–] doctortran@lemm.ee 2 points 7 hours ago

That's what I used to do, but a good portion of the time they'd continue their spiel to try to change my mind.

Where are you shopping where you are routinely encountering cashier's that are this pushy about the apps? The overwhelming majority of cash register attendance are underpaid employees that are just trying to get you through the line. They said the line because they have to say the line, but most have no intention of really trying to sell you on it.

Once upon A time, these things were just rewards programs, with the key ring bullshit. Were you signing up for each and every one of them too?

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

This....is a BATTERY SUCKING LIE PEOPLE!! - Aldi ad

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

I like apps for stores I frequent. Most people do.

Having 150+ is a personal problem.

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 41 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If the apps wouldn't be slow React Native or whatever "multiplatform framework" crapware, then I'd actually say that well designed, native Swift UI (iOS) or Material (Android) apps can enhance the user experience for a lot of services that are otherwise offered via website. Native integrations with shortcuts, widgets, fully supporting accessibility features of the OS etc.

The problem is most apps are just low-effort web app conversions.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 28 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

The problem is most apps are just low-effort web app conversions.

If only that. Web apps are relatively well sandboxed. Most dedicated apps (that should be websites) are designed to harvest as much data as they can and spam you with notifications/ads.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›