this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
782 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

58424 readers
4654 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buttons@programming.dev 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (14 children)

When I think of a tech worker union my thoughts first go to standardizing everyone's pay and limiting what I can earn myself. I've probably fallen to anti-union propaganda.

A tech worker union that says nothing about pay could still do so much.

A union could ensure that the company's incentives are aligned with worker's incentives around things like on-call.

I'd love a union that forced a company to give all on-call workers compensation. Something like:

  1. If you're woken up in the middle of the night, you automatically get 8 hours comp time (time off), plus 2x the time you spend on-call during off hours.
  2. Accrued comp time over 20 hours must be payed at 10x normal pay if the employee leaves the company for any reason. The idea here isn't for employees to accrue comp time, but to give the company a strong incentive to ensure employees use their comp time.

Basically, if a company is having lots of on-call alerts, or the company is preventing employees from using their comp time, you want this to be directly painful to the company. Incentives should be aligned, what is painful for the worker should be painful for the company.

Or, regarding "unlimited PTO". I'd love to see a union force companies to:

  1. "Unlimited PTO" policies are fine, but they must have a guaranteed minimum amount of PTO specified in writing. So none of this "yeah, we heave 'unlimited PTO'; oh, we're really busy this quarter, so can you wait to take PTO until next quarter?".

Tech workers have it good compared to a lot of workers, but there are still plenty of abuses a union could help with, even if the union never even mentions pay.

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unless unions work differently where you live, they are a democracy that will pursue whatever issues its members vote on. If members don't think pay is a problem, why would they try to change it?

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Had to explain this to my dad when he told me about the carpenters unions not allowing his brother to work after he retired.

1: Unions are the democratization of workplaces; for better or for worse.

2: Should you really be working when you’re claiming retirement checks from your union?

3: People are often falsely confident on their views about things. People love to complain about the government while hardly understanding anything about it. The same happens everywhere, including unions. Just because some dude is miffed doesn’t mean they have any right to be. They can be misinformed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

A union lets you have leverage when negotiating for anything with the corpo. Individually you have a little if you're top talent, and none otherwise. Very few people are irreplaceable, some are somewhat painful to replace, the rest are less so. We've been mistaking the tight labor market in this industry for our own self worth but hopefully the last couple of years have helped most of us snap out of it.

Speaking of pay, the structures I've seen at a union university for example have pay scales based on the job and defined pay increases in every job. You know what you're gonna get paid for a position you're applying, and you know what you're gonna get paid years ahead in that job. With that said, a union can negotiate any sort of pay scheme. Perhaps most importantly a union can negotiate to get a much larger portion of the profits for the engineers. You think some folks in tech are paid very well, but if you look at the value they generate, they might not be paid nearly enough. If you think a union might take your 500K salary to 300K while raising some other people's salaries you should consider that a union can take it to 800K or more. Assuming this is happening at one of the wildly profitable companies where this money exists.

And of course a union gives you the leverage to negotiate any other conditions like the ones that you mentioned. On-call, PTO, remote, etc.

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah the tech labor market has really proven that the idea of employment contracts being negotiated between equal parties isn't true even in the best of circumstances.

Even when companies are desperate for talent, and willing to spend ridiculous amounts of money on salaries and perks, they are not willing to negotiate on anything outside of that. They still have terrifying contracts with non-compete and damages clauses they could use to wreck your life, no workplace democracy, unpaid overtime and whatever other shit is legal.

But hey! You get free snacks and enough money to buy the dinners you don't time to cook and save up to survive your inevitable burn out!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How afraid are you of retribution if you tried to unionize?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

I guess not much if I were an Intuit employee and significantly if I were at Apple. 😄

That's why you get as many people to sign up first, organize BEFORE the vote, not after.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How afraid of retribution is my manager/ hr because they're all too fat to walk home when they get 4 flat tires.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] odium@programming.dev 108 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Damn, wtf are intuit and GM doing to their engineers?

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 101 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Maybe they just forgot to brainwash them with anti-union propaganda

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 70 points 3 days ago

This is likely the case with GM given that their manufacturing is unionised. Engineers just got a demo what that can do for them last year. They aren't getting the raise assembly workers got.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 40 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Silicon valley is full of H1B visa holders who can't speak up politically or risk deportation.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

The only workers left at 𝕏itter are H1B ones just trying to survive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] huginn@feddit.it 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Edit: cause some jackass is implying I'm a bot - I should have joined a union and a union would've protected me from the mass layoff in '23 but that doesn't change that while there I never thought about needing a union because it was such a nice place otherwise.

As someone who previously worked at Google - they didn't have any antiunion propaganda.

They just, like, paid well, had top tier benefits, great perks, and had a good work life balance.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 9 points 2 days ago

I am a human being, and I enjoyed my employment at Google

Meanwhile, at Google

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IamAnonymous@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

The union autoworkers get good benefits like overtime pay for work over 8 hours. Union working come in at 6, then take a fixed breakfast and lunch break and then leave at 2:30. Anything over that will need approval and overtime pay. I’m surprised Ford and Stellantis isn’t alongside with GM.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

Idk about intuit but GM is probably a result of their union coworkers getting awesome Bennie’s.

[–] aeki@slrpnk.net 12 points 3 days ago

Funny, seeing them at the top gave me a favorable impression of them, but seems to have caused the opposite for you. My impression was probably due to, like someone else said, feeling like maybe they're not being drilled with as much anti-union propaganda.

But I'm from a place where you have to go out of your way not to be part of a union.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

The US labor laws need to be updated too. They suck compared to the 1st World EU members. I fully support unions too.

[–] ashughes@feddit.uk 65 points 3 days ago (4 children)

If you want to read about this on a website that isn’t full of ads and doesn’t just present as an ad for their own news app, here is the source material by Blind.com.

Unfortunately I couldn’t find a link to the raw survey data and I generally don’t trust surveys that aren’t accompanied by raw data.

I went looking for the data because 1901 respondents across 32 of the largest companies globally doesn’t seem like it would be statistically representative of any one company. If you assume the same sample size per company, which it probably isn’t but again that’s unverifiable because I couldn’t find the raw data, you’re looking at, what, 60 employees for a company the size of Google?

Look, I’m a recovering tech worker who left the industry because of the toxic work culture, having spent a quarter of my life at one of the good ones. Even there I saw the value of unions. No matter the industry, workers deserve the right to collective bargaining and fair treatment. But I don’t think surveys with unverifiable data help move that conversation forward.

Now, if I’m mistaken and someone finds a source link to the data that we can all verify, I’ll happily take another look and reconsider my opinion on it’s validity.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Holy shit Intuit and GM better shape the fuck up or the workers should just hurry up and fucking do it.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

GM also has tons of union employees which has some impact on the non-union portion (i.e. better benefits etc), so seeing first-hand what unions can do for you might make them more likely to support one even if their current working conditions are great.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

Apple, tesla, and Google suspiciously at the bottom three there

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

Absolutely. I've been laid off twice in my IT career. It would be nice to have someone on my side for a change.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My company is on there. I wish we had a union

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Make an alt-alt over VPN and tells us more. 😁

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 7 points 2 days ago

Me too. I work for none of the above, but yes I would.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 35 points 3 days ago

Not bad, I thought our heads were still further up our asses.

[–] steventhedev@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Anything using Blind as a "verified industry source" is going to be skewed to the type of person who uses Blind. Beyond that, it's low sample size, and there are suspiciously round fractions for some of the larger companies. Worse, because Blind is blind - this doesn't represent current employees, but merely people who worked at some point in the past at those companies.

Not saying it's not good - just saying not to get overly excited over a badly done survey

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

If more would join a union it would likely cause the other companies employees to find more interest or courage to join. Please join a union if you are not already. Support yourself and fellow workers, solidarity is key.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

These numbers seem grossly inflated. How was the study conducted?

Edit:

However, on average 67% of those polled in the Blind survey said they were likely to join a union and 73% said that unions “mostly helped.”

Eh that's reasonable. Blind (the app) is pretty good, alibet toxic

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Would a union be able to repeal this lame IT overtime pay expectation? This dumb rule was the $27.63 over ten years ago too. I once worked at a place and a co-worker was told by his staffing agency that they didn't have to pay overtime.

https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/17e-overtime-computer#:~:text=However%2C%20Section%2013(a)(,duties%20and%20who%20are%20paid

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

A collective agreement can't include less than the law but can provide more than the law, so they could add paid overtime in the collective agreement and the employer would have to follow that even though the law doesn't make it mandatory.

A collective agreement is a work contract, the only difference is that the employees negotiate it as a group instead of one by one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If that happens, they are going to see a lot of things seemingly from the past connected to union activity though.

Not just strike breakers being hired (some of tech work is not that demanding in expertise, think typical Hindu web devs), but also actual spies, saboteurs, hitmen being involved, propaganda attacks, possibly legal attempts to bust unions and use of force. And, of course, crucial positions in union bureaucracy becoming attractive for organized crime (which likely has very few of people associated with it ever convicted, as in mostly invisible until it's too late).

Doesn't mean you shouldn't do it. Just the more adult level of the game. Considering that the tech industry is at the core of our civilization now, and considering its profits, this can get as historic as battle of the Blair mountain.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

this can't happen because the kill switch activates after 72 hours and "order 66" initiates, plunging the whole stack into lockdown and the org into absolute chaos.

hope there were backups you strike busting pieces of shit.

don't fuck with IT professionals. you take away the only fulfillment we get out of life and you will come to personally understand the meaning behind, "there are worse fates than death"

apes strong together.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Grunt4019@lemm.ee 16 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Now how do we do it? Especially with remote work, not sure how to organize.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 14 points 2 days ago

Especially with remote work, not sure how to organize.

Remote work didn't stop you working, did it? Why would it stop unions from working? There's on the ground work for sure, but it's mostly desk stuff, especially in IT.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Get ready for corporate announcing the layoff of 67% of the workforce

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They're doing that in any case when they can get away with it. Not forming a union isn't going stop them.

load more comments
view more: next ›