this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
185 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59651 readers
2632 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Anyone who has been surfing the web for a while is probably used to clicking through a CAPTCHA grid of street images, identifying everyday objects to prove that they're a human and not an automated bot. Now, though, new research claims that locally run bots using specially trained image-recognition models can match human-level performance in this style of CAPTCHA, achieving a 100 percent success rate despite being decidedly not human.

ETH Zurich PhD student Andreas Plesner and his colleagues' new research, available as a pre-print paper, focuses on Google's ReCAPTCHA v2, which challenges users to identify which street images in a grid contain items like bicycles, crosswalks, mountains, stairs, or traffic lights. Google began phasing that system out years ago in favor of an "invisible" reCAPTCHA v3 that analyzes user interactions rather than offering an explicit challenge.

Despite this, the older reCAPTCHA v2 is still used by millions of websites. And even sites that use the updated reCAPTCHA v3 will sometimes use reCAPTCHA v2 as a fallback when the updated system gives a user a low "human" confidence rating.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

That’s suspicious - I can’t pass 100%. here’s a new captcha for you: make the user do 100 in a row

  • 100% is ai
  • <50% is dumb “ai”
  • in between is a person
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Cool, so can Google shut it down now?

[–] cheddar@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

My score is lower.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Our long international nightmare is finally over!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I mean, we literally train them by completing the CAPTCHAs. Why do you think you were picking things like bikes, traffic lights, cars, and busses? The only question now is what's next...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sudo@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Pro-tip for webscrapers: using AI to solve captchas is a massive waste of effort and resources. Aim to not be presented with a captcha in the first place.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Depends on the case, sometimes its unavoidable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Great, so now can I get an add-on to my browser that skips these?

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In use an add-on that does 90% of these for me already on Firefox. I would tell you what it's called but I'm not at my PC.

Which (on a side note) I'd totally go downstairs and check for you, but I just sprained my ankle real bad, and am dreading stairs. Sorry :(

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Wait, so if a visitor fails the v3 Captcha, v2 is used as a fallback?
That makes absolutely no sense.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Not quite: it'll drop a v2 captcha for you to solve when a v3 one can't clearly classify you one way or another.

So if v3 isn't entirely sure you're human, it'll make you do a v2.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›