this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
721 points (97.7% liked)

Science Memes

10501 readers
2118 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mononomi@feddit.nl 58 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

And then humans came along to mess with em

human in protective clothing harvesting horseshoe crab blood in a lab

[–] Tja@programming.dev 32 points 2 weeks ago

Stupid life-saving copper based blood...

[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I find it hard to understand, what special thing the blood has, that is not synthetically manufacturable. With most foodstuff companies trying to synthetically manufacture as much of the food as they can, what makes this "Near Threatened" animal, so important to harvest?

[–] Dave2@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I googled it for you, there is LAL which is a blood clotting agent (that exists only in the blood of horseshoe crabs) that reacts with the bacterial capsule which makes it important for vaccine safety tests. Alternatives do exist but ya know, money is more important to corporations than some animal's life.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Alternatives do exist but ya know, money is more important

What are the alternatives, and how can we reduce their costs to match that of horseshoe crab blood?

[–] Dave2@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have done some more googling (I can't stress this enough, I am just googling)

The top alternatives are rFC (genetically modified cells produce the required enzyme) and MAT (human monocytes do the detection) They're more costly, picking ready fruit is easier than growing an orchard.

Also I should mention how new the alternatives are, they're just (2018 is just now for me lol) getting their approvals and regulations so given time LAL will be replaced.

given time LAL will be replaced

That sounds encouraging!

[–] mayo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So they'll use alternatives once the crabs go extinct.
Well... 😶

[–] KellysNokia@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's like a more realistic representation of what Neo would see when he wakes from the Matrix

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 51 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Absence of paleontological evidence of change in appearance does not mean evolutionary stagnation

[–] kbal@fedia.io 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Doesn't it? It doesn't seem obvious either way. Are you an actual paleontologist, or just guessing?

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 46 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Molecular biologist.
It's mostly a matter of what we don't know. Paleontological evidence certainly shows that horseshoe crabs didn't change much in their appearance. However, we just don't know to what extent other aspects of their biology are as conserved. Therefore, it is just unscientific to say that horseshoe crabs are 'living fossils' or that they didn't evolve for millions of years. They may have, they may not have

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I came to mention the same. Static phenotype ≠ static genotype.

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 5 points 2 weeks ago

Makes me wonder, would epigenetic speciation be possible?

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry! We're both biologists, we get nerdy.

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

No I love it - that's why we're here.

I learned something today and hope to gently explain it to my degenerating/conservative father (but let's not get into that kettle of fustercluck!)

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Much obliged ! I was just thinking these strings of letters kinda looked like words

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly, I'm pretty sure they post any old brain rot here and then have an AI fabricate supporting articles online just to mess with us...

[–] kbal@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago

It makes sense. I just wasn't sure how likely it would be for species to evolve in significant ways over a long time without obvious changes to the shape of their fossils. Difficult to spot evolution happens a lot, apparently:

Cryptic, or sibling, species are discrete species that are difficult, or sometimes impossible, to distinguish morphologically and thus have been incorrectly classified as a single taxon. Cryptic species are found from the poles to the Equator and in all major terrestrial and aquatic taxonomic groups [2, 3]. For example, a recent meta-analysis yielded 2,207 articles reporting cryptic species in all metazoan phyla and classes, including 996 new species in insects, 267 in mammals, 151 in fishes and 94 in birds [2].

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah exactly. I’m not a biologist but I am aware that horseshoe crabs are harvested for their blood and its unique properties. How much evolution (in the last 450MY) have they undergone in terms of their immune system and other microbiological processes? We may never know but I think it’s quite a stretch to assume “none!”

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I would have to assume there's some ecological pressure they're either experiencing or shielded from. If they're under environmental pressure, they are either exceptionally developed to endure environmental changes or they're adapting to the environment in ways that don't reflect in their physiology. If they've just found a niche biome where the ecological conditions are fairly static, and they're well suited to the environment, what changes would you see other than some generic genetic drift?

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 2 weeks ago

One minute earth just did a great video about that https://youtube.com/watch?v=_skYZFmr0Lg

[–] whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Science abhors a vacuum but it fucking loves a crab

[–] Paraponera_clavata@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

Nature abhors a vaccuum

[–] apex32@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Nice doggie!

Nice doggie!

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

Heckin sea roomba

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yet some of them still managed to evolve into spiders...

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 weeks ago

They were bored one afternoon

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

One of the best things I got to do as a kid was go down to horseshoe crab time at the shore at pet them and hear a science human talk about their fancy blood. The fancy blood of the horseshoe crabs, not the science human's blood.

[–] kindenough@kbin.earth 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Fascinating creatures. TIL they are more closely related to arachnids than crabs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_crab

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

How close are they to horseshoes?

[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Practically identical.

[–] kindenough@kbin.earth 3 points 2 weeks ago

Hihi...asking the most important questions.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

How about hand grenades?

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

Lazy bastards

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago
[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

all extant species (except hu-men) be like: evolve? whats that. just livin out here.