this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45317 readers
89 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] warm@kbin.earth 0 points 1 month ago

Give it another 8 years of development Sony, maybe it'll be worth playing that time around.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

Do it again Sony!

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago
[–] Coki91@dormi.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is actually an amazon show (idk the name) thats having a Concord devotrd episode sometime this november, that might be a lead for re-releasing concord as f2p, idk but would be funny

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I'm a sucker for hero based OW style games. I would have played it if ANY marketing had happened at all, and I had had ANY idea it was even launching this year.

The only marketing I heard was the less than 1k players at launch.

[–] Wanderer@r.nf 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Deadlock has a better marketing, and it's a closed alpha lmao

[–] Faydaikin@beehaw.org 0 points 4 weeks ago

The marketing: "Valve might be making a new game..."

Everyone: "Oh my gooooood!?!?"

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

They had a reveal trailer as part of the PlayStation State of Play back in May, and basically the entire internet collectively lost all interest the moment it revealed that it was a 5v5 hero shooter.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I looked at it but damn the game looks ugly as fuuuuuck. And it's not a thing i usually care about. From a technical aspect i would say it's really good looking, but the colour palette they used and the character design is laughable. The game would need some apex movement or something Titanfall like to save it. But it's just generic and ugly.

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's still fun, though. I think it has a cohesive look that I would call "visually distinct for gaming purposes" rather than specifically beautiful.

[–] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 weeks ago

You're visually distinct for gaming purposes.

Whoa, sick burn.

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

yeah sorry i was playing Overwatch with my dog and their friends from the dog park for the like 3 days Concord was out. Pls release it one more time it looks good!

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

I liked when they said “it’s concording time” and concorded all over the place.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's a game about a comedy song duo from New Zealand that shot their entire career's load of writing songs on a season of a TV show?

[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They call me the gamedevopotomus, my servers are playerless

[–] Chickenslippers@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

My games are so potent that in this small segment i made all of the players in the area pregnant.

[–] vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 weeks ago

I'm the cash-shop-anocerous. All my microtransactions bleed your wallet like a phlebotomus.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Do they let women play?

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm out of the loop did they un-release the game?

[–] B312@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Servers are gonna close today

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They refunding people or was it free to play?

[–] B312@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Suprisingly they’re refunding everyone, it was 40 USD too

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Wow from the sounds of it they're gonna lose like, 400 dollars out of this debacle

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

There’s also the $100 million development cost

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 0 points 4 weeks ago

Presumably it will come back as some free-to-play, live-service microtransaction-filled nightmare that can be supported by a few whales and eventually make up the cost

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 weeks ago

Shit should be public domain, free for anyone to host themselves. I don't give a shit about this particular game but leaving the preservation of cultural history up to for profit entities is not a good idea as they have proven time and again.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 0 points 4 weeks ago

It will be delisted on the 9th

[–] 10_0@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 weeks ago

I'm sure the game will retain the 138 concurrent player base in 2 years time /s. But for the novilty sure why not.