this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
9 points (84.6% liked)

Technology

60585 readers
3391 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 9) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HeckGazer@programming.dev 0 points 4 months ago
[–] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 0 points 4 months ago

Sounds like the free market has spoken. Please die quickly, ""AI"" industry

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Bet they get the pass that the Internet Archive didn't.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Cool, so if openAI can do it, that means piracy is legal?

How about we just drastically limit copyright length to something much more reasonable, like the original 14 year duration w/ an optional one-time renewal for another 14 years.That should give AI companies a large corpus to train an AI with, while also protecting recent works from abuse. Perhaps we can round down to 10 years instead, which should still be more than enough for copyright holders to establish their brand on the market.

I think copyright has value, but I don't think it has as much value as we're giving it.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Honestly with the current pace of cultural output we're at, even 5 years feels generous. What was made in 2019 that still seems terribly relevant... Is there still a brisk trade in Frozen II merch I'm not aware of?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SankaraStone@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Isn't copyright about the right to make and distribute or sell copies or the lack there of? As long as they can prevent jailbreaking the AI, reading copyrighted material and learning from it to produce something else is not a copyright violation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Perhaps they should go back to what they were before the greed machine was spun up.

[–] genuineparts@infosec.pub 0 points 4 months ago

Oh no. Anyway...

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Y'all have the wrong take. Fuck copyright.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 0 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Oh how quick people are to jump on the side of copyright and IP.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] afiresword@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

For years Microsoft and Google were happy to acquiesce to copyright claims from the music and movie industry. Now all of a sudden when it benefits them to break those same laws, they immediately did. Now those industries who served small creators copyright claims and up against someone with a bigger legal budget.

It's more evident then ever how broken our copyright system is. I'm hoping this blows up in both parties faces and we finally get some reform but I'm not holding my breath.

This is an assumption but I bet all the data feed into Content ID on YouTube was used to train Bard/Gemini....

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›