this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58424 readers
4343 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] subignition@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

One more great reason not to use Apple phones.

[–] BarrierWithAshes@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

Snapchat or iPhones? How about I take none?

[–] michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe a reason not to use Snapchat?

[–] ruckblack@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Both is good

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What good will they do when all Android manufacturers are trying to copy iPhone? No headphone jack, no expandable memory, no removable battery.

I'd rather buy an iPhone instead of a shitty clone that won't receive updates after 3 years.

[–] pop@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It never ceases to amaze me how iPhone users think a bump in a version years down the road, keeps them secure while the browser in iOS needs whole god damn system update to upgrade.

You wait for that patch for a Safari vulnerability for whenever Apple feels like it but Android devs can push patch and deploy within days or hours. And also sideload it, if a really important fix would take a long time through regular channels. And also there's more than 1 browser engine on Android, so all users aren't vulnerable to the same exploit at the same time.

But hey, keep on swallowing that Apple marketing wholesale though.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I've never bought any Apple product, you triggered ball of catpuke. I'm just pissed at Android manufacturers copying Apple without offering any pros of iPhone.

5 year old iPhone still updates to latest iOS. Good luck trying to do that with 5 year old Android.

Keep raging at the mere mention of Apple though. Sounds like a wonderful existence.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Funny how my reply to this dimwit comment was removed but telling me to swallow Apple marketing wholesale is totally a-ok.

Fuck mods.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Google also split Security Updates from main OS updates so that they can control and push them independently of the manufacturer. So you might miss out on fancy features from Android XX or whatever, but at least vulnerabilities will continue to be patched

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'd rather buy an iPhone instead of a shitty clone that won't receive updates after 3 years.

You need to look more carefully and androids because there's plenty that are not clones. Very few all clones so you appear to be selecting for your own bias

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

because there's plenty that are not clones.

If you're looking at only midrange then sure. Otherwise only Sony is still offering headphone jack on their flagship. Go to GSMarena and see for yourself.

And when it comes to UI, Android is constantly dumbing itself down with no option to opt-out. Remember 9 button layout from however many moons ago that was replaced by thick ugly blocks?

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When did Apple release their Foldy phone? An Android manufacturer (spacing on the name) is already getting ready to release a tri-fold phone

In any case, iPhone and Android copy each other all the time. Sometimes it's Android copying iPhone and sometimes the opposite, it's just the way it goes in the smartphone industry

[–] Smokeless7048@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

or 10x physical zoom, punchthrough cameras, USBC...

In a lot of ways, iphone just copies android. They are just better at marketing themselves

[–] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

USB C was mandated by EU. 10x zoom is simply iPhones trailing nehind Android phones.

[–] Smokeless7048@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

im saying that the android broke ground and got there first on all of these, while the iphone likes to pretend its cutting edge.

[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago
[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder if this is related to the issue with old deleted photo re-appearing.

[–] aniki@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sounds more like Apple makes a MAC like string that identifies an iPhone and Snap is creating a database of IDs against Apples wishes.

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 0 points 1 month ago

sorry i meant to reply to another comment under this.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Factory reset doesn't delete persistent app data enabled by app developer [paraphrased]

What about Erase All Content and Settings? You seriously can't fully erase a second-hand phone you bought?! That's insane

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What's even worse is that Apple is not fully erasing the phones that they refurbish.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's worse than that is that Apple isn't even deleting the photos that you delete.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago

What's worse than that is Apple.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

They are fully erasing it. But it's still the same iPhone. With a device ID that is banned.

[–] whynotzoidberg@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Apple urges developers to not use DeviceCheck for anything beyond basic device verification, and if you're a developer that's also misusing it, then you should definitely cease that—there are probably more reliable ways to check whether it's the same user trying to access an account from a device or not.

I don’t think I care about not being able to erase the device ID. It seems useful to have this, actually, for back-tracing if need be.

Snapchat probs shouldn’t use the DeviceCheck services improperly. But hey, that’s just like my opinion, man.

More, not very interesting, info on DeviceCheck services here: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicecheck

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

APPLE DOES NOT CARE ABOUT YOU AMD DOES NOT CARE ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What does AMD has to do with your privacy.

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

I can’t see what was posted above anymore, but the DeviceCheck API lets app developers store 2 binary digits (that means 4 different states: 00, 01, 10 or 11) per device on Apple’s servers. So, no, these don’t get erased during a Factory Reset as they’re stored on Apple’s servers. But your phone will.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Apple urges developers to not use DeviceCheck for anything beyond basic device verification, and if you're a developer that's also misusing it, then you should definitely cease that—there are probably more reliable ways to check whether it's the same user trying to access an account from a device or not.

Sounds reasonable…

But then, why would you use it?

For example, you might use this data to identify devices that have already taken advantage of a promotional offer that you provide, or to flag a device that you’ve determined to be fraudulent.

Oh, ok. Wait, what? But…

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah? That makes perfect sense, don’t use it beyond a basic device verification, for example verifying if the device has already been used in a promo or stolen.

Those are instances where you need to check the device itself not the user.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

So getting my iPhone repaired can ban me from a promo that I haven't used yet? How does that make sense.

[–] Giooschi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Luckily Apple strictly controls the App Store and will never allow apps to abuse this, right? Right?

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Good. Snapchat is and always has been such a garbage and useless app.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

Like social media for even bigger losers

[–] raker@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

Why would apple not wipe the device completely on repair or when activated?

[–] dog_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago
[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

The equivalent API on Android gets a new id when the phone is resetted.

Weird that Apple doesn't do that on refurbished phones

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gosh that's sucks people on iPhone using Snapchat.

Says a guy on an android that doesn't even know what Snapchat does.

You're not missing anything.