this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59601 readers
2940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Begging iPhone to play the catch up game and just have Android's basic features lol

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (10 children)

I switched from android to Iphone and there is nothing I miss, I certainly don't miss how shit the the usb in-ears were on android, all of them haf issues

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Remavas@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Except that many Android phones also don't have replaceable batteries anymore.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hope it doesnt lead to smaller batteries though. It feels like it could since they have to put the battery so it's accessible.

[–] GeekySalsa@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

But it'll also allow you to just carry 2 batteries and swap if needed. Even if you don't want to do that, when your battery ages enough that you can't at all go through a typical day, you can easily change it out yourself to a fresh one to refresh your phone.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Unfortunately it won't.

This legislation isn't for batteries that replaceable. More like "can be swapped by a technician in 5 minutes" replaceable.

Additionally, if the manufacturer guarantees (IIRC) 70% capacity after 3 years, they don't have to do anything at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're saying that, as if the Android platform hasn't consistently been enshittified too over the years.

We're getting limitation after limitation, on top of pre-existing vendor lockouts, and the ever-growing list of hardware changes, that make it impossible to do anything with the device, outside of using it as shipped

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

What the hell? There are literally full OS alternatives for Android phones. The comment is light on specifics and none of it rings true afaik

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh, here he is. I was worried for a second we’ve lost him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

In two years time Apple, and every other smartphone manufacturer on the EU market for that matter, will be forced to make the battery user replaceable and that one will most likely benefit everyone; unless Apple wants to release two versions of every iPhone to comply with EU regulations which they won't.

[–] Fishytricks@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When they do come to it. I hope its the easily swappable like the ones in Nokia 3310. Otherwise its pointless imo.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

AFAIK, the EU defines "user replaceable" as literally that; you open a hatch, pull the battery out and stick a new one in.

[–] Fishytricks@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Guadin@k.fe.derate.me 0 points 3 months ago

They'll make the replacement so expensive nobody will do it. And then there will be a new rule mandating it needs to be a reasonable price. Apple will say it's reasomable because it factors in environmental costs, and so the dance continues.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, they do not define it that way.

And there are exceptions based on capacity and how long you guarantee the battery capacity will be good for. IIRC, if it still has 70% capacity by 3 years time, it doesn't have to be replaceable at all.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can you really guarantee that? I mean, it's pretty much dependent on individual usage.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Fuck, let's hope they at least allow screws. Click-in latches are prone to breaking and wearing out

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

How many often are you planning on replacing the battery in your phone that it would wear out the panel?

[–] Sentient_Modem@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The ware would most likely come from someone that has a spare battery that is ready to go. Think of your phone burning 80% of the juice and you’re about to hop on a flight that you’re barely going to make (no time to charge). Slap that stand by battery in and off you go. That’s what I did with my old Nokia or blackberry back in the day. Oh and for my HTC aria.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Sounds stupid, arent there charging ports on planes?

And other than plane where external battery is an issue, i just have a small brick that connect to my phone by the magnets on the back and wireless charges it, this is only really needed if you are doing something all day on the phone, like going around a city, taking pictures

[–] aard@kyu.de 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

With my N900 I used to travel with 6 to 10 charged batteries to have a few days of runtime. Things got better now with powerbanks - but for something like hiking just carrying a few spares would still be smaller and lighter.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Honestly for hiking I’d suggest a power bank with solar charge capability. One thing to charge them all.

[–] aard@kyu.de 0 points 3 months ago

The space used by the smallest solar charger I've seen on Amazon seems to be similar to 6 or more batteries in the format the N900 was taking - so if you look at space, slow charging from solar charger, and reliance on sun conditions taking individual batteries seems to be the better option for a few days hike. It's also easier to stow individual batteries to wherever you still have space left.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

Hust make sure, that you can detach the solar panel. Batteries don’t like the heat and the solar panel most likely lives longer than the power bank, so you want them to be replaceable individually.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 months ago

Meh, most iPhones live in a case, it'll be fine

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

Hopefully they keep selling a phone with no user replaceable battery. Id rather have the weather proofing than a battery i need to swap out one time after owning the phone for over 4 years.

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

How many times has your phone needed the weather proofing in the last 4 years? Mine is 0, at least twice. On the flip side, I have needed a new battery 2 times.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ive needed the IP68 rating a handful of times. I have needed a new battery zero times on my 4 year old phone. If I need the battery replaced, Ill just take it to apple and have them swap it out.

Its still at 70% usability, which still lasts me all day.

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's the thing though, why is apple the only ones authorized to swap out your battery? That service isn't free, and they're massively overcharging you for it.

It's also not impossible to build a phone that is water resistant and has a swappable battery, but that's besides the point. Personally I'd rather have a swappable battery.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Maintenance is never free, so im okay with a service fee every four years rather than buy new phones every time they get wet. Im not saying my particular view is right for everyone, but its what I want. I get why people want replaceable batteries. No problem with it. I just would rather not have them. So if there is an option for both models, one with, and one without that feature, this is a win for everyone. If not, and only one or the other is implemented, then its going to suck for whoever is in the party that got left out.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why only 4 years? The fairphone 5 is water resistant and has a replacable battery. The Samsung Galaxy S5 was fully waterproof and had a replacable battery.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

None of those phones are IP68 rating

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

IP68 didn't exist when the galaxy S5 came out. The fairphone has a replaceable screen and is made by a tiny company that doesn't have the budget for full waterproof testing. Often phones will have waterproofing but will not spend the money for the expensive testing for certification, see: Fairphone 4, pocophone, etc.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Well then I like my phones a little bit more expensive then since they're certified. Gives me peace of mind.

[–] BigBrainBrett2517@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I like how you keep getting down voted even though you have made it clear that it's your own personal choice/bias and acknowledge it's not for everyone.

I agree both options would be good 👍

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] datendefekt@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Just like with USB-C, which the EU regulated and now the iPad and IPhone have.

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

the stupidest thing is iPad had USB-C since 2018! and yet on iPhones they latched on to lightning for another 6 years before EU forced them to standardize

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

They were keeping their promise of 10 years of Lightning ecosystem support. Dropping the old iPod connector was highly controversial.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They were earning millions from lightning royalities

[–] Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

And they promised to do so for at least 10 years.

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

we promise we'll use the inferior, proprietary connector

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hushable@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

no no no, that was just Apple being brave /s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›