this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

61263 readers
4001 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It feels dirty to agree with an ISP on something. But even the worst corporations are on the right side of something from time to time I suppose.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

How about this: courts can't order ISPs to disconnect customers.

To me, that's like ordering my driveway barricaded because I have too many traffic tickets. If I'm breaking the law, charge me with a crime or sue me. But don't block my internet access, that's just uncalled for.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 months ago (5 children)

The ISPs? doing something nice?? for the customers???
Shit, I must have slipped into the wrong timeline or something

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

It's less work and cost for them if they don't have to do this.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Nope, they just don't wanna be bothered. But if it's a win it's a win.

[–] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 5 months ago

Don't wanna be bothered/Don't wanna lose that sweet, sweet monthly

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 0 points 5 months ago

It means they can fire the one guy that sends the angry letters and get rid of a printer.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

ISPs can't take your money if they cut off your internet

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

It's without a doubt motivated by their own loss of revenue but a consumer friendly take is still commendable

[–] Oaksey@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

iiNet in Australia used to fight for their users’ privacy until they eventually sold out.

[–] C126@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Shut down their access to computer stores and the power companies while you're at it. Only fair. No piracy without computers or power.

The road that we're slowly headed down actually leads to a reality not too far from what you describe.

Computers are increasingly becoming a nested-doll situation wherein the end user is only given access to a lower privileged portion of hardware that exists within a larger supervisory system, of sorts. It will all be (and currently is) marketed as "for your security" "features" while owner control of computer systems is slowly being eroded.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I want to say as an employee of an ISP I literally dealt with users who essentially couldn't get high speed internet anymore at their address because we were the only option and their grandkids downloaded movies. This put the entire household at a grave disadvantage educationally compared to other households. It shouldn't be a thing.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That this is even legal in the first place is insane. Digital communication is at least as vital, if not more vital that postage. Image someone is just banned form getting post delivered or he gets throttled to only once every other week...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peanutyam@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’m glad I live in Australia where this doesn’t happen thanks to previous attempts by IP copyright holders (mainly US based ones) to have similar policies forced upon ISP’s here and being told by judges here that the penalties and expectations and demands made by these said IP copyright holding companies was over the top and excessive and thrown out of court…..

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago

I think the precedent set here was that downloading a copy of a movie carried the penalty of the monetary cost of obtaining the movie lehally, so its just not worth pursuing. I might be wrong about that.

[–] 4lan@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I had Verizon threatened to shut down my internet. I had been receiving notices for close to a decade via email, I assumed they were all toothless. And that was true in the past

I just called the Verizon copyright office and told them that it wasn't me and I would change my Wi-Fi password 😂

It was suspiciously easy as if they really don't care and are just trying to be compliant

I got a VPN and no longer have to deal with it

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)
[–] ytg@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wahots@pawb.social 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›