this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58513 readers
6231 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Musk: starts allowing Nazi shit on Xitter

Advertiisers: Hey, we don't like Nazi shit. We might stop advertising if that keeps happening.

Musk: Go fuck yourself. Is that clear? I hope it is.

Advertisers: stop doing business with the guy who told them to go fuck themselves

[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago
[–] TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago

Who could've ever seen this coming? lol

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago

Elon then sues them for listening to his advice

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

Do what other businesses do - just reincorporate under a different name

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Today, the House Judiciary GOP's official account on X called GARM being discontinued a "big win for the First Amendment" and a "big win for oversight." X CEO Linda Yaccarino also applauded the news.

It's just opposite day? We just say whatever it the opposite of what's true?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right wingers live in the UpsideDown.

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Beating my enemies into submission = A big win for Freedom and Liberty

The first amendment is simply when conservatives get what they want.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

We really don't say it enough, but fuck Linda for being a hollow, complicit piece of shit human.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You know the "O" in "GOP" stands for "opposition" right?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago

I'm partial to Gaslight Obstruct Project. This is probably somewhere in "gaslight" as in "this is a good thing! You must be crazy to think this is bad, everyone says this is a good thing."

[–] schema@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Even if this group shuts down completely, all this does is waste twitter's money while it also tells advertisers to stay the fuck away from ever do any business on Twitter.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

And now he has to sue the advertisers individually if he wants to continue this idiotic plan. That'll surely convince people to spend money on X

[–] vanontom@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I read this similarly. Most significantly, advertisers in the group are probably less likely to spend on tweeter now. The complete opposite of Elen's goal. The advertisers simply "deleted" the group (not any actual ad agencies), because it was calculated to cost the least. The group, GARM, was an attempt to collectively manage harm to their brands, which they will obviously continue to do in other ways.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I heard the new club is going to be called thenoelons and Elon Lindenstrauss is going to be a member.

[–] __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

It says "no ElonS" We're allowed to have one

[–] EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel like this will only hurt him in the long term, advertisers in general are probably more likely to avoid X in the future. I know I would.

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

"Hey, come over here. And when you do, I won't let you leave"

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Thebular@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

It definitely is, but they filed in Texas which doesn't have anti-SLAPP laws for federal cases

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

He literally bullied a non-profit organisation set in the world to use advertisement money responsible into ceasing operations.

Loss for the world once again, and the article even says that Republicans celebrated. That country is sick.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Good. They don't get to fucking bully whoever they want.

Elon didn't like their shit, and called them on it.

And they fucking cried and gave up, right away. lmao

[–] androogee@midwest.social 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey

You aren't advertising with me. Stop bullying me and give me money.

If you don't give me money right now, you're bullying me.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep, the irony of two bullies calling each other bullies is awesome to watch!

But Elon won, cuz the other side shut down quick! lmao

[–] androogee@midwest.social 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What did he win? They aren't going to resume advertising with him. They got out of the lawsuit without having to pay lawyers or change their behavior. What did he win?

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

So do you honestly think he just wanted their money?

You don't think that Elon Musk is over there laughing because they dropped the lawsuit, and thinking that he's top dog cuz they went away?

Have you seen his ego?

I mean, I like Elon, but he's def a slave to his ego. I still like him, but come on...lol

He started a legal fight with someone, they backed down. Money losses or not, he definitely won. Because they dropped.

And he is grinning.

I mean, I def would prefer money. But I don't think that's always his goal.

[–] androogee@midwest.social 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If a stupid person being impressed by himself counted as "winning," there'd be a whole lot more winners out there.

But it doesn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I mean, I like Elon

Honest question, why?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 1 month ago

how do you mean? they just "hydra'd" on him. If he wants to sue them now for leaving xitter he will have to go after them individually.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't get it. Elon didn't win a thing, he lost harder.

He complained advertisers were banding together and boycotting his platform. He starts a frivolous lawsuit.

So now even more advertisers are boycotting his platform.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you hate people bullying people yet you love elon bullying a non profit into silence?

also this isn't going to bring advertisers to twitter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago

Note to myself: Whenever I do contracts or somehow being responsible, I‘ll put a proxy company in between. If things go bad, I just shut down that responsible proxy and am out of duty.

Just an interesting observation about business behavior.

[–] afivedaystorm@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Why can’t he shut down already?

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

On the one hand I hate Elon Musk. On the other hand I also hate advertisement.

So.... win / win?

[–] gearheart@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

Lose/lose situation here unfortunately.

Basically he threw a fit. It worked.

It affected something that it should not have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

jk rowling, elon musk.. what is it with billionaires suing people to silence criticism

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 0 points 1 month ago

It's cheap to them and bankrupts their victims or forces them to settle. There should be a way to punish frivolous lawsuits by %income/assets.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 1 month ago

They are all the biggest snowflakes. The slightest criticism breaks their fragile egos. Billionaires really require a safe space.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago

They are getting all this great free press about why to avoid Musk, must have figured their job is done.

[–] norimee@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

THIS IS NOT A GOOD THING.
He didn't shut down advertisers, he shut down an organisation for best practices in advertising.

Wiki World Federation of Advertisers

WFA's aim is to champion effective and sustainable marketing communications worldwide. ..

...WFA formed the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), a global cross-industry alliance which aims to improve digital safety and eliminate harmful online content....The alliance has introduced guidelines concerning misinformation and new standards on ad placements...

...WFA is a founding member of the Unstereotype Alliance, UN Women's flagship partnership with the marketing industry to eradicate harmful gender stereotypes in advertising...It is also a founding member of the Coalition for Better Ads, a cross-industry initiative to improve consumers’ experience with online advertising.

WFA holds Global Marketer Week, a series of events bringing together brand marketers to learn about the latest public affairs issues and best practice in marketing.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The frivolous lawsuit worked then.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Maybe it's a Win win. Less advertisers and Elon looks like a psychopath and disuades further ad income for his hate platform

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

More economically to shut down and reincorporate than to spend a bunch of money on lawyers.

But I doubt Musk is going to see a flood of new ad revenue out of this.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

new ad revenue

I'm no marketing guy, and all other things aside, signing an advertising agreement with X would be a hard "NO" after this suit.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago
[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 0 points 1 month ago

I wish Elon treated the whole planet like his children.

He would just jet off and never communicate again, we would be free of this cancer for good.

load more comments
view more: next ›