this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58513 readers
5160 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] digredior@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 month ago

Because fuck ‘em, that’s why!

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

damn. how would russians watch unwanted ads now?

[–] EisFrei@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AFAIK they didn't have to watch ads since the sanctions took effect, because Google wasn't allowed to monetize them.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wow. Can't wait for this empire to sanction itself.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Prime, Netflix, Hulu, any news website, pornhub, etc...

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago
[–] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

While I understand people’s initial reaction to think this is a positive thing, I don’t believe it is. The less free speech and media the Russian people have access to, the more control Putins propaganda machine has.

[–] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

Yeah... I suspect it has something to do with controlling info on Ukraine pushing back perhaps.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

Same difference. They won't do anything about it anyway.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Practically all russians have had access to fully uncensored YT just one click away on their smartphones for over a decade (until today).

That didn't really change anything. Russia's problems lie in the attitude of the overwhelming majority of its people, not in the lack of access to information.

They make a conscious and fully informed choice to be genocidal imperialists and embrace authoritarianism.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Russia's problems lie in the attitude of the overwhelming majority of its people, not in the lack of access to information.

They make a conscious and fully informed choice to be genocidal imperialists and embrace authoritarianism.

"they"?

what happens to dissidents in Putin's Russia? It's easy to criticize a repressed population when you're not risking anything.

were all U.S. citizens responsible for the invasion of iraq? In U.S. where you don't disappear for criticising the government and it's choices, what difference did that freedom of speech make for Iraqis?

Where in the so called "west" do people keep buying from Putin's Russia through cloaked trade?

while we're on the subject of "genocidal imperialists embracing authoritarianism", who are the greatest sponsors of one of the longest running apartheid regime? Is "the attitude of the overwhelming majority of its people" the cause of this genocidal apartheid?

nuances! "Overwhelming majority" is just trying to get by. Most people are not power hungry psychopaths. If Putin, Netanyahu and some more of their ilk died today, world would be a better place tomorrow.

fuck this! it's time to go offline and read a decent book.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (20 children)

What about so called russian "dissidents"? Navalniy and his team openly supported the annexation of Crimea (and destruction of Ukrainian and Crimean Tartar culture).

The recently exchanged "dissidents" also showed their true colours by supporting the annexation of currently occupied territories in Ukraine.

We are not discussing US right now! The US did not annex Basra state, steal all the local children, force everyone to speak English and send anyone caught talking Arabic to a torture chamber; all with support of somewhere between 65% to 85% of their population.

The overwhelming majority of Russians are genocidal imperialists. They support invasions of foreign countries, annexations, attempts at elimatining local language and culture and setting up mass torture camps for anyone opposed to the yoke of russian degeneracy.

The "trying to get by" pitch is a ruse. Both qualitative and quantitative research (different methodologies, including ones that attempt to account for preference falsification) show this is not true and that on an outcome basis, the overwhelming majority of russians are indeed genocidal imperialists.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The US did not annex Basra state

Of course not. But the US is actively funding a genocide in palestine and many similar atrocities around the globe. This empire has a long history of colonialism, imperialism, genocide, slavery, racism, war, etc. The overwhelming majority of USAians are also genocidal imperialists. Just listen to NPR. Just look at the presidential candidates.

I'm not saying the alt-empire is any better. I'm saying that empire is the same everywhere. All of these politicians are extremely privileged hanging out together at the UN, dinner parties, etc. regardless of what brand of state they serve. It's all the same system and same people. Every state and all empire is trash.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

So when did senior US politicians call for extermination of Gazan identity, banning arabic in Gaza and annexing Gaza as a new state?

You do understand that the term "genocidal imperialist" has actual meaning, right?

The overwhelming majority of russian are genocidal imperialist because they support russia full scale invasion and they have always supported the annexation of Crimea.

We can have a conversation about the bad and good things done by the US, but I don't see what this has to do with the topic at hand?

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

What about so called russian "dissidents"? Navalniy and his team openly supported the annexation of Crimea (and destruction of Ukrainian and Crimean Tartar culture).

The recently exchanged "dissidents" also showed their true colour by trying to support the annexation of currently occupied territories in Ukraine.

We are not discussing US right now! The US did not annex Basra state, steal all the local children, force everyone to speak English and send anyone caught talking Arabic to a torture chamber; all with support of somewhere between 65% to 85% of their population.

The overwhelming majority of Russians are genocidal imperialists. They support invasion of foreign countries, annexation, attempts at elimatining local language and culture and setting up mass torture camps for anyone opposed the yoke of russian degeneracy.

The "trying to get by" pitch is a ruse. Both qualitative and quantitative research (different methodologies, including ones that attempt to account for preference falsification) show this is not true and that on an outcome basis, the overwhelming majority of russians are indeed genocidal imperialists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don’t think a grassroots revolution will be taking place anytime soon, but this is aimed at the young people of Russia who are against the war. The old people there love Putin but I suspect they also aren’t watching YouTube.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The majority of the young people in Russia are genocidal imperialists. Support for extermination of other countries is of course higher in the older generations, but that doesn't change the fact a solid majority of young (e.g. 18 to 29) are genocidal imperialists.

I understand that it might be reassuring to repeat platitudes like "young people of russia are against the war", but this is clearly not true.

Even the framing is suspect. What do you mean by "the war"; the full-scale invasion? In Ukraine, the war started in 2014 with annexation of Crimea and russian invasion of Donbas.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

May I know where you found the info that a solid majority of young Russians (well, I think you only talk about those that did not already leave) supports the war?

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A tiny % left and even among them there are many genocidal nationalists and fake opposition types.

Look up any research on the topic Russian Field, Levada, LSE List Experiment on support from the war among Russians.

I believe the general trend was that every age category had a majority and that at one point the 30-40 age group had slightly lower support for russian annexation and destruction of Ukrainian identity than the 18 -29 age group.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I don’t know those sources, but I fear those aren’t really representative

Maybe someone wants to dig, I have no time for that right now..

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I hear that all the time, "but what about the challenges of polling under an autocracy?", as if they were the first one to think about it.

But if you show alternative methodologies that account for preference falsification and the estimates for preference falsification turn out to be low, you never hear back from people.

But this approach is understandable, people in the west have a very primitive understanding of russian culture and russian constantly code switch when pushing polemics for western audiences and when speaking in russian.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I can not 🤷🏻‍♀️that is why I asked, would be nice finding reputable sources that leak outta there

But "look at any research” does not imply good sources..

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

Is this a new development? If so could it be due to the Ukrainian incursion? I thought telegram was more popular there for that stuff

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have a slightly different take: I think it’s a positive thing because the sooner we destroy YouTube, the sooner YouTube will be destroyed.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Feels like your priorities might be out of order.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

My priorities are thus:

  1. Destroy YouTube
  2. Everything else

They know what they did.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

turkey re(?)banned roblox

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Putin's fight against reality continues. Who will be the victor?

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Putin, of course!

[–] kenkenken@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Putin is reality.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] considine@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty is straight up State department propaganda.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

lemmy.ml is straight up lemmygrad / hexbear Tankie propaganda.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (9 children)

While this is somewhat true (state funded, but with some level of independence), your statement doesn't jive with reality.

I follow RFE/RL in both English and several other languages. Their reporting is far better than many multi-billion dollar private news companies in the West.

And it's not a minor difference either, the western news companies are not even close.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why has it been accessible to begin with? $$$

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There hasn’t been any monetization since shortly after the invasion started. If I have to guess, Google was just footing the bills so they don’t lose presence to some local player when it’s all over.

I’m actually more curious as to who finally pulled the plug, Google, or the Russian government; and why finally now. Article made it seem like the Russian govt wanted to violate net neutrality and slow down YT’s traffic, but makes no mentioning of which party ultimately took the service down.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

It's the russian government. There have been rumors that they are planning to shut down YT for good in the last few months.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago

this is terrible news for right wing reactionary youtube channels.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago

That's what you get. Ukraine doesn't have access to YouTube either thanks to the rolling blackouts. So... I guess cry more? Or if you're Russian and reading this, and you want change for your country: realize you are many, they are few, and the few they have aren't currently as strong as they were before your country illegally invaded Ukraine. It won't be easy but maybe you and your brethren can secure a safer future for your children, those children, and all the children you will never meet, by rising up against your oppressors

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Wasn't Russia throttling YouTube bandwidth before hand to prepare for this? Along with banning cell phones for their soldiers, I guess they're going for complete media blackout and control.

Edit: I guess they announced 70% slowdown a couple weeks ago and just went straight to full shutdown.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 month ago

Banning cell phones for soldiers on the front line has become common since the phone transmissions are used as bombing targets.

However, the blackout of YouTube for the civilian populace is mainly for control purposes, especially as Ukraine is fairly active on YouTube.

[–] gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is this the Russian Government censoring them, or is YouTube just pulling out because the sanctions mean they can't run ads to Russian IPs?

[–] FeelThePower@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

the biggest ISP in Russia, rostelecom, started throttling youtube by 80% last month and is planning a full blocking. It's a curious choice though... even the hardest most Z people are not happy about it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Binette@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Yoooo peertube in russia?????

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I’m going to miss the one Russian I follow. Maybe this will help another alternative platform take its place.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's just so strange to read how Americans blame Putin for everything the rest of the world blames their government for.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] peregrinetech@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

And I really liked the Russian Youtubers... Nonetheless, it's a different kind of censorship and it might just lead to more propaganda in the end...

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cant Russians make money from yt due to that Ukraine thing

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›