I just don't get how we can't just sue them. You'd think the big copyright holders, record labels in this case, would be all over that.
this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
59587 readers
2940 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I can only assume they see it as a double edged sword. Rights-holders (read: publishers, labels & studios) would have the power to sue here, not creators (read: artists, musicians and filmmakers).
These rights-holders also want to use AI so they don’t have to pay or deal with creators, so while they don’t love that other companies are making money off their content, they’re more just mad that someone else did it first before they could exploit their own content in the same way.
Sue and set precedent, and they might accidentally make it impossible for them to turn around and do the exact same thing once they have the technical know-how.
Entirely speculation, but it’s the only thing that makes sense to me.
With corps, assume malice and you'll be right more often than not.
Uhm, this came out as part of a law suit against them by the record industry? So they are in the process of being sued.
While not surprising, the admission, which was made as part of court proceedings responding to a massive recording industry lawsuit against the company, shows yet again that many AI tools are trained on, essentially, anything that companies can get their hands on.
Thank you. I‘m honestly baffled at the amount of comments talking out of their ass in this thread as if the legal system has made 0 progress or effort to deal with anything AI related by now. It‘s reminiscent of how cryptobros talked about NFTs not so long ago and how all the scammers are untouchable because laws don‘t mention NFTs directly or something. AI is the largest case of copyright infringement ever committed and labels do not give a damn about subjective and debatable „but it’s transformative“ arguments. Again, it‘s baffling.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Even the one where I moist-farted the riff from "7 Nation Army" and looped it for 24 hours, i.e. 7-nation-army-beans-and-dairy-mix.aiff?
Just ask for it to make you a song in the "Beans and Dairy" genre
They said "All the music files", not unholy abomination from the seventh layer of ass hell.
Ass of the beholder etc.?
You already named it aiff (Artificial Intelligence Fart File)
I would like to hear this if it’s real.
I like suno because its fun to think of dumb shit to make a song over
i had it make me a few gangsta raps about the solar system. it was fun
Here are my favorite experiments (I wrote the lyrics) :
https://suno.com/song/a71c88ce-4a7a-4e6e-b0f1-8125c6be871b
https://suno.com/song/7faf3ab5-04da-44ce-903a-1d05eb86a8ef
Just wanted to say I like your burrito song. Very creative and funny. And the harmless country music is the cherry on top.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Same, I made a rap about you can't trust a fart and was surprised that how decent it turned out.
Fantastic! I love music and am currently training an AI of myself to determine whether or not I would like certain music, movies, tv shows, video games, business ideas, technolory, porn and art. In order to train my personal AI properly I need a copy of everything every human being and corporation has ever created so I can personally assess it.
This is great news for everyone!
load more comments
(1 replies)