this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58458 readers
4482 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is it "AI is hard" or "AI is not the best solution for this"?

[–] jherazob@fedia.io 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's "LLMs cannot do what the salesmen and CEOs say it can do by it's very nature"

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 0 points 2 months ago

When renk seeking is glorified, there is an economic incentive for this parasitic behavior

[–] Yewb@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

What you mean magic box can't do X, we need to milk it for revenue.

Now that I think about it giving AI rights might save humanity from corporations.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It isn't AI yet. They have just called it that. It was an illusion.

Now money is telling them the truth.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

AI is intelligent like a Hoverboard hovers.

[–] TheBlackLounge@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

Artificial intelligence is intelligent like artificial grass is grass. That's how the word artificial works. It just means man-made, says nothing about quality.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I still consider it just another meta within chat. Its the next step from having the search summaries. It theoretically will aggregate more relevant links.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

theoretically will aggregate more relevant links.

Yep! I've seen real data scientists use LLMs for exactly that, and get great results!

I don't think we will see decent link search as a widespread success for another couple of years, though. Seems like most companies aren't willing to pay data scientists to build their (domain specific) models. Some of the code co-pilot tools are already quite good. But I bet Chevrolet of Watsonville won't get the next level of quality for a bit longer.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Careful saying that obvious thing, some people here will climb all the way up your butt about it. 🙄

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can I just put a comma between "AI" and "Google"?

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

There is so much more between them ;-)

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

I really hate the conflagration between AI and LLMs. We’re seeing a polishing of LLMs and they’re great for mimicking language, but they don’t “know” what they’re saying. We’re still quite a ways off from GenAI and have just started working on more specialized AI. But without some massive leaps in understanding logic and filtering out garbage it’s gonna be a while.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No surprise. LLM is to intelligence what a moped is to an airplane. Both have wheels.