this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59587 readers
2940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)

I don't see any technical specification i the article, but if they inject the ad at the start of the video, making it part of the video itself, would make possible to just skip it using video controls. To avoid user skippin ad thru video controls there should be client-side script blocking it, so an ad-blocker can use this to tell apart an ad from the video itself.

Can anyone correct me on this?

Also, would this affect piped and invidious too?

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Honestly it would be trivial for them to make the video controls server side too and simply not accept fast forward commands from the client during the ad.

We might be in a "Download and edit to watch ad-free" world with this change.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] explore_broaden@midwest.social 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That sounds correct for me. It is possible for them to switch to a system where everyone can manually skip past the ad in the video stream but adblockers are useless (by not sending and indication of the ad to the client), but I don’t see that happening since most people don’t use adblockers and letting all of them easily skip past every ad is probably bad for profits.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rinox@feddit.it 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's not literally part of the video, exactly because of what you describe. They are separate streams that get injected into the player before the normal video. You can't skip them or interact with them in any way (pretty sure it also breaks any purchase links etc). Piped or Invidious don't have them, ytdl also doesn't download them.

As of now, afaik, you won't see them if your account wasn't selected for the experiment, if you are in incognito mode (with uBO on) or if you have uBlock Origin (and other adblockers) off (you'll see the normal ads and then the video).

Otherwise, apply uBO new script if you get them

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gamers_Mate@kbin.run 0 points 5 months ago (47 children)

They just escalated the arms race between ad and ad blocker. All this could have been avoided if they actually did something about the scam ads.

load more comments (47 replies)
[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Meaning they can bury that toxic ad placement bidding now?

No need to answer, i know they wont.

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

Oh man, I wonder why no one ever thought of randomly injecting ads into content before? What geniuses they must have working at YouTube. I can’t even comprehend the big-brainedness. I’m sure people will love it.

[–] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Humanity accepts your challenge! See y'all on the battlefield ;-)

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›