this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58458 readers
5101 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mozilla, the maker of the popular web browser Firefox, said it received government demands to block add-ons that circumvent censorship.

The Mozilla Foundation, the entity behind the web browser Firefox, is blocking various censorship circumvention add-ons for its browser, including ones specifically to help those in Russia bypass state censorship. The add-ons were blocked at the request of Russia’s federal censorship agency, Roskomnadzor — the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology, and Mass Media — according to a statement by Mozilla to The Intercept.

“Following recent regulatory changes in Russia, we received persistent requests from Roskomnadzor demanding that five add-ons be removed from the Mozilla add-on store,” a Mozilla spokesperson told The Intercept in response to a request for comment. “After careful consideration, we’ve temporarily restricted their availability within Russia. Recognizing the implications of these actions, we are closely evaluating our next steps while keeping in mind our local community.”

“It’s a kind of unpleasant surprise because we thought the values of this corporation were very clear in terms of access to information.”

Stanislav Shakirov, the chief technical officer of Roskomsvoboda, a Russian open internet group, said he hoped it was a rash decision by Mozilla that will be more carefully examined.

“It’s a kind of unpleasant surprise because we thought the values of this corporation were very clear in terms of access to information, and its policy was somewhat different,” Shakirov said. “And due to these values, it should not be so simple to comply with state censors and fulfill the requirements of laws that have little to do with common sense.”

Developers of digital tools designed to get around censorship began noticing recently that their Firefox add-ons were no longer available in Russia.

On June 8, the developer of Censor Tracker, an add-on for bypassing internet censorship restrictions in Russia and other former Soviet countries, made a post on the Mozilla Foundation’s discussion forums saying that their extension was unavailable to users in Russia.

The developer of another add-on, Runet Censorship Bypass, which is specifically designed to bypass Roskomnadzor censorship, posted in the thread that their extension was also blocked. The developer said they did not receive any notification from Mozilla regarding the block.

Two VPN add-ons, Planet VPN and FastProxy — the latter explicitly designed for Russian users to bypass Russian censorship — are also blocked. VPNs, or virtual private networks, are designed to obscure internet users’ locations by routing users’ traffic through servers in other countries.

The Intercept verified that all four add-ons are blocked in Russia. If the webpage for the add-on is accessed from a Russian IP address, the Mozilla add-on page displays a message: “The page you tried to access is not available in your region.” If the add-on is accessed with an IP address outside of Russia, the add-on page loads successfully.

Supervision of Communications

Roskomnadzor is responsible for “control and supervision in telecommunications, information technology, and mass communications,” according to the Russia’s federal censorship agency’s English-language page.

In March, the New York Times reported that Roskomnadzor was increasing its operations to restrict access to censorship circumvention technologies such as VPNs. In 2018, there were multiple user reports that Roskomnadzor had blocked access to the entire Firefox Add-on Store.

According to Mozilla’s Pledge for a Healthy Internet, the Mozilla Foundation is “committed to an internet that includes all the peoples of the earth — where a person’s demographic characteristics do not determine their online access, opportunities, or quality of experience.” Mozilla’s second principle in their manifesto says, “The internet is a global public resource that must remain open and accessible.”

The Mozilla Foundation, which in tandem with its for-profit arm Mozilla Corporation releases Firefox, also operates its own VPN service, Mozilla VPN. However, it is only available in 33 countries, a list that doesn’t include Russia.

The same four censorship circumvention add-ons also appear to be available for other web browsers without being blocked by the browsers’ web stores. Censor Tracker, for instance, remains available for the Google Chrome web browser, and the Chrome Web Store page for the add-on works from Russian IP addresses. The same holds for Runet Censorship Bypass, VPN Planet, and FastProxy.

“In general, it’s hard to recall anyone else who has done something similar lately,” said Shakirov, the Russian open internet advocate. “For the last few months, Roskomnadzor (after the adoption of the law in Russia that prohibits the promotion of tools for bypassing blockings) has been sending such complaints about content to everyone.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why? Do they have employees that live there?

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 0 points 3 months ago

Probably, or employees’ families maybe?
“That’s a nice little nephew you got there, it would be a shame if something happened to him “.

[–] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Communication from Roskomnadzor should be censored straight to/dev/null.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 0 points 3 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Stanislav Shakirov, the chief technical officer of Roskomsvoboda, a Russian open internet group, said he hoped it was a rash decision by Mozilla that will be more carefully examined.

“It’s a kind of unpleasant surprise because we thought the values of this corporation were very clear in terms of access to information, and its policy was somewhat different,” Shakirov said.

Developers of digital tools designed to get around censorship began noticing recently that their Firefox add-ons were no longer available in Russia.

Roskomnadzor is responsible for “control and supervision in telecommunications, information technology, and mass communications,” according to the Russia’s federal censorship agency’s English-language page.

In March, the New York Times reported that Roskomnadzor was increasing its operations to restrict access to censorship circumvention technologies such as VPNs.

“For the last few months, Roskomnadzor (after the adoption of the law in Russia that prohibits the promotion of tools for bypassing blockings) has been sending such complaints about content to everyone.”


The original article contains 703 words, the summary contains 160 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (10 children)

Wow, wtf Firefox? Not even Chrome is blocking some of the add-ons...

Guess enshittification is starting to creep into Firefox now too

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

God I'm getting sick of that word.

[–] DarkGamer@fedia.io 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm sick of the concept it represents.

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Besides, this instance isn't even enshittification anyway.

Enshittification is when a company makes the user experience worse to squeeze more money out of them. This is just government regulation.

[–] cloudless@lemmy.cafe 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Still Mozzila Corporation seem to be trying to earn more money by staying in the Russian market.

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] cloudless@lemmy.cafe 0 points 3 months ago

How else would you explain Mozilla's decision?

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not really, they're a for profit company with very little market share and as a result very little wiggle room to, say, be banned from an entire market region

They're protecting profits over people like so many other companies do. Mozilla Firefox is no savior, they'll protect their profits just like any other.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 3 months ago

If they get kicked out of the Russian market then those extensions wouldn't be available there anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah me too, but can we not discuss it in a more nuanced and useful way than just shoving this word into every single post on Lemmy?

[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If things would stop getting shittier, then yes. I'm not entirely sure that it applies here so I understand your annoyance, but you're seeing "enshittification" everywhere because we're seeing the practice of enshittification everywhere. I applaud it being called out. We shouldn't be seeing higher prices for worse experiences, but that's the current trend. If you're tired of seeing the word, then it'd probably be a good idea to take a break from c/technology because I don't think it's stopping any time soon.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 3 months ago

We're not, though. The word "enshittification" was coined to describe a very specific kind of shittiness, not just a general "I don't like this development."

Now that the word is being used in the more general sense, though, we've lost a useful way of referring to just that very specific kind of shittiness. We already had plenty of ways to say "I don't like this development" so this is a net loss for the descriptiveness of language.

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think we see it so much because kids on the internet think it's fun to say. It's dismissive and stifles meaningful conversation.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think it describes a phenomenon we've seen repeated over and over almost without variation. Every single internet service slowly gets shittier as they switch from investment to returning investment. Everything going back to MySpace and Yahoo Spaces went from awesome to abandoned as soon as they started trying to monetize the platform they built. It's fair to have a word for that and observing the inevitability.

Does it do any good if it is inevitable? I don't know. The Fediverse seems to be a direct reaction to it, and I'd like to see more.

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't disagree that the word should exist, I'm saying it's become overused to the point of becoming meaningless. Take this entire thread, for instance. This is not enshittification - yet, here we are.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Alright. It's fair to point out that it's not applicable. People do that shit, though. But if it wasn't so damn applicable all the time, you probably wouldn't notice and be sick of it.

I'm already two martinis into my evening, so I'm done worrying about it. Cheers, mate.

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

Fair points all around. Have a great evening!

[–] FeelThePower@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago

It has been since proton imo. only one person in my group is still on the base version of the fox, the rest of us have preferred forks.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Think about it, pretend you are the Mozilla CEO. You get a ~~request~~ demand from Putin that you block these addons, and you have two options. A) Make a stink and stick to your principles, of which Putin has none, and so you get Firefox banned in Russia altogether. Now, Russians who want to use it cannot, and are forced to use other browsers that Putin can control. or B) Comply with the request, knowing users can still load extensions from the side.

Only one of these two options leads to the possibility of Russians being able to use Firefox with these addons, and it's B.

Oh and fuck Putin, just because.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago

people who were using these addons probably had them installed already, so it'll only affect new users

[–] cloudless@lemmy.cafe 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When should an organisation stop complying with totalitarian governments? First they stop the extensions.

What if they request for Firefox to add site filters, or else?

What if China demands similar bans for extensions related to Taiwan, Hong Kong, Tibet etc?

It can go on and on. Some baselines should not be negotiable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mangaskahn@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They chose to comply with the request and become one of the browsers Putin can control. Not sure how Mozilla gets credit for anything good here.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I guess there isn't a good path here. There never is when Russia is involved. I guess just less bad maybe, I dunno

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Contributing to Russian oppression and fascist agenda.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 0 points 3 months ago (17 children)

“Following recent regulatory changes in Russia, we received persistent requests from Roskomnadzor demanding that five add-ons be removed from the Mozilla add-on store,” a Mozilla spokesperson told The Intercept in response to a request for comment. “After careful consideration, we’ve temporarily restricted their availability within Russia. Recognizing the implications of these actions, we are closely evaluating our next steps while keeping in mind our local community.”

People are getting upset about this, but it only applies within the country where Roskomnadzor has authority, and it's temporary pending further review.

Slow down your condemnations. Mozilla, as a law-abiding organization, must at least acknowledge the requests of a regulatory agency within its own country. Whether you agree with their requests or not, Roskomnadzor has governmental authority in this context within Russia.

Stop jumping to conclusions, actually read the article, and put the fucking pitchforks away.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (11 children)

Mozilla, as a law-abiding organization, must at least acknowledge the requests of a regulatory agency within its own country.

TIL that Mozilla is a Russian company.

But seriously why the hell would Mozilla be obliged to acknowledge this request? Do they have offices in Russia?

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Do they have offices in Russia?

Are you implying that if my office isn't in a certain country, that means my software doesn't have to obey that country's regulatory agencies?

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (9 children)

I mean… yes? Generally laws only apply within the borders of their jurisdiction.

What, are the Russian police going to come to the US and arrest the CEO of Mozilla Corporation?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

But seriously why the hell would Mozilla be obliged to acknowledge this request? Do they have offices in Russia?

Roskomnadzor has regulartory authority in Russia. Roskomnadzor has the legal authority to regulate communications technology within Russia. They are completely within their rights to enforce this within Russia, regardless of what people living in other countries think about it, and organizations operating within Russia are legally bound to abide by the Russian government's regulations within Russia, just as they are in every other country.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the reminder.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

LOL

"switch to Firefox!" Yeah sure. What absolutely typical corporate cowards. Fuck Mozilla.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not convinced this is "Fuck Mozilla" territory.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I'm genuinely curious why? I may have worded it strongly, but as a Russian, there are very few things as unethical to me as cooperation of any kind with the Russian government.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Vitaly@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Since russia is a terrorist state I dont really understand why even communicate with them in the first place

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (15 children)

It's not that we want to communicate with the state of Russia, it is so citizens of Russia can see real and true information from the inside and out.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] maxenmajs@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is an unpleasant dilemma. What is the other option? Stick to their principles and let Russia ban Firefox? It's not ideal but people in Russia can still install add-ons from file.

[–] nadram@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

With the same logic, nothing is stopping people to download firefox from alternative sources 🤷‍♂️ There would be losses in market share (in Russia) had they refused to play along, but now Mozilla spread it's buttcheeks for governments to impose themselves. Once again, it's mostly about the money.

[–] englislanguage@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Once again, it's mostly about the money

Do you have evidence or is this pure speculation?

How and why should Mozilla get money from Russia? Isn't it more plausible if Russia were blackmailing Mozilla?

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

How and why should Mozilla get money from Russia?

I’m guessing via search engine defaults for that region

(I Don’t actually know if they have a monetary agreement with yandex)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] entropicshart@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Agreed - rather give the people there the ability to install this themselves than have them try to block Firefox overall.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›