this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
357 points (96.1% liked)

Fediverse

28489 readers
613 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

I think we can give facebook/threads the bad end of the bargin IF we have a data protections.

You know how powerful copy-left was for open source? I think we can do the same for Lemmy servers. We can have users agree (formally) that the data on a particular server cannot be used for training llvm's advertisements, marketing profiles, etc, and make it legally binding.

Even if we don't federate with them, Meta can still harvest the data so we should add these protections regardless. Maybe there is already something like this and I'm just unaware of it.

If we do add these protections and we ensure that the largest instance (e.g. Lemmy.world) is community controlled, I think it could work well for bringing more content to Lemmy.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Yep, on a public forum like this we lose very little on privacy by federating with them. What we do stand to lose is comment and post quality, but that’s trivial to fix by simply blocking threads on a personal level.

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You can scrape Lemmy instances for training data without even running an instance.

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, sorry if I'm not great at communicating. That's exactly what I'm trying to point out when I said:

Even if we don't federate with them, Meta can still harvest the data so we should add these protections regardless.

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's the thing, anything public is fair game. This is why Reddit is ruining their API.

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

It's not fair game for for-profit bussinesses training LLM's. That's part of why Reddit made the move; so that companies would need to pay Reddit for access to the data for legally training models

[–] Masimatutu@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What does lemmy.world being the biggest have to do with any of this?

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

As opposed to a facebook-controlled server being the top search result for Lemmy.

I see why that's confusing so I edited my comment just now

[–] Masimatutu@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

I think this is the wrong take. If we want Lemmy to be truly community-controlled, we need many small servers, as opposed to the current situation of one server controlling half the userbase. Also, which server is Facebook-controlled? Lemmy.world is in the minority by federating with Threads.