this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
200 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37750 readers
196 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zworf@beehaw.org 30 points 11 months ago (8 children)

These calculations are a bit off IMO. They factor the total amount of mining and divide it by the number of transactions.

However, the amount of mining is not dependent on the amount of transactions.

I'm not a fan of bitcoin due to the wasteful proof of work mechanism but 'blaming' the transactions is not really fair IMO, especially because people don't really use bitcoin as a payment method anymore. It's just used by speculators now.

[–] janguv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago (6 children)

However, the amount of mining is not dependent on the amount of transactions.

Entertain my ignorance on this for a second, but isn't there some sort of dependence here? Like not a strictly casual dependence, but if transactions were, say, to magically halve for a few days, would that not affect the mining required and thus the total energy expenditure of the mining?

(Obviously the limit case would show this to be true, in that in the absence of any transactions at all, mining would cease. But I'm after something a bit more clearly casually related, somewhat like supply and demand in the marketplace – consumption of beef driving more supply and more methane, e.g.)

[–] tookys@fosstodon.org 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@janguv

@Zworf @technology

The mining isn't based on transactions, the mining is set to target a 10 minute block time, the difficulty changes based on how much mining capacity there is.

If a block takes less than 10 minutes the difficulty goes up. If it takes more the difficulty goes down.

Each block has a maximum capacity of 2500 transactions, which is why gas is used to prioritize who gets added in a block.

There have been many blocks with zero transactions.

(May bot be correct #)

[–] janguv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

Thanks for clarifying that!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)