this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
15 points (94.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7238 readers
234 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I posted this in another comment, but from the article:

The amount each state, territory and Washington, D.C., will receive from the $42.5 billion program depends primarily on the number of unserved locations in each jurisdiction or those locations that lack access to internet speeds of at least 25 megabits per second download and 3 Mbps upload.

and

States will have until the end of the year to submit initial proposals outlining how they plan to use the money, which won’t begin to be distributed until those plans are approved

and

Under the rules of the program, states must prioritize connecting predominantly unserved areas before bolstering service in underserved areas, or those without access to internet speeds of 100 Mbps/20 Mbps, and community anchor institutions, such as schools and libraries.

So not exactly, "without stipulations"

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have the telcos ever gotten in trouble for not fulfilling the terms of their handouts?