this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
463 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10176 readers
63 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 26 points 1 year ago (23 children)

Those same Americans will just ignore that there are other candidates and it'll be yet another presidential election where 49% of voters claim that they don't really support the person they vote for, and that you have to do the same as a moral imperative.

And, as it's been since Reagan, no matter who we elect we'll only get conservative outcomes.

[–] NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org 38 points 1 year ago (22 children)

and that you have to do the same as a moral imperative

Railing against this fact doesn't magically make it untrue. Not voting for the lesser evil means you don't care which evil wins. If you legitimately think GOP rule isn't any worse than Dem rule, then by all means don't vote or vote third party. But if you think Christian fascism + neoliberalism is worse than just neoliberalism, then once the primaries are over you need to vote accordingly. Voter disenfranchisement is an age-old tactic you're comment is falling right into.

And I say this all as a market socialist, so don't for a second think I like the Dems

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)