this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

15629 readers
204 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey folks, just been chatting with urology nurses at work and wondering if anyone has or knows of medical models that could be 3D printed? Specifically something staff can practice putting a catheter in. I'm hoping there is something about so I don't have to sculpt a whole model

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lgmjon64@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think realistic texture is all that important. Most of the practice is more about the technique and maintaining sterility throughout.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just to clarify, you don’t care about the sterility of specific part? Fdm prints in particular can’t be kept sterile.

I assume you need it to be flexible-ish at the very least, which you might achieve with TPU, but I still say mold casting is the way to go.

[–] jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The part itself don't need to be sterile. The important part is maintaining sterile technique, which is the main issue with catheters due to the area involved and the amount of tubing that goes in.

Whether or not the stuff is actually sterile doesn't matter.

[–] lgmjon64@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly this. It sounds like OP wants it to be an instructional aid. It does not need to be sterile, the people practicing need to practice how to don sterile gloves, then drape and prep the site sterilly and insert the catheter correctly.

[–] Kom@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Sorry for the slow reply, I posted that while on lunch.

The thought was more to use the model as a teaching aid, a few of our patients go home with a catheter and its easier to demonstrate on a model rather than just images and explaining it, we have "Harry" who is an abdomen with genitals, but don't have a female model. I can see my search history is about to get super interesting.

[–] Kom@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

It wouldn't need to be sterile at all, it's just a teaching tool for patients before they are discharged home. Showing exactly where things go and why is much easier to understand when you can see it, an absolute ideal model would be a cross section.