this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
-24 points (36.4% liked)

Privacy

32120 readers
396 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Its the only thing making is a good choice, while people choose Brave, TorBrowser or Librewolf instead.

Come and join the discussion.

Firefox needs to have some courage. Get rid of all those fake funding by Ad companies. Block Ads and trackers by default. Actually. Dont use damn Google as that contract will run out anyways.

Chrome is the Google browser. Firefox simply offering nothing more (on the outside) than it.

What do you think? Do you use Firefox out of the Box? Or another browser?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry but untrue. Firefox accounts are secure and opt-in. Private browsing is stupid and fingerprintable. So mullvadbrowser has its own fingerprint, and then also disabling private browsing will increase it.

There is no reason to do this. Private browsing is nice, an easily accessible amnesic session. But for a permanent profile just presetting

  • delete cache, history, session, downloads
  • delete cookies, dont save to disk

Is enough. Not saving stuff is irrelevant for websites targeting you.

Also, in private browsing container tabs dont work. This would make it useless for me.

Mullvadbrowser is like Torbrowser without Tor, Librewolf without PB too. They have probably the same hardening otherwise.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I hope you feel better after typing all that, because I didn’t need it.

Don’t know where all the “private browsing” stuff came in, as if I mentioned anything about using a browser’s “privacy mode”, because I didn’t.

You appear to have conflated some of what I said, but I honestly don’t care enough to figure out where. Use whatever you want, it doesn’t matter to me, but casting Mullvad browser as pointless when it just doesn’t fit your particular needs or preferences is just ignorant.

You asked what we’re using, that’s what I’m using.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No I didnt attack you or something? Huh?

I just said Mullvad is a new browser that simply copies Torbrowser but without Tor. And this is annoying as they are adding a new fingerprintable browser that is uselesd for many works because of PB, so people use plain firefox and think "privacy is uncomfortable".

Torbrowser is this "anonymity mix kit" that also forgets everything you did. I dont need that as for many threat models its not needed. But its the Torbrowser and thus has a shared fingerprint.

Switching off private browsing to then allow you to save sessions and pinned tabs for example, makes you stick out.

I wrote with the Mullvad Devs already and they dont care. They just copy torbrowser.

Librewolf is the better browser, its not branded and actually has GUI settings added. And they dont use private browsing, even though its amnesic by default, just like arkenfox.

It makes no sense to use Private browsing, and its a pain to deal with

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you done with your Ted talk?