this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
96 points (94.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43947 readers
638 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's barely thievery though, I'm talking about going into the office and stealing someone else's laptop, or taking money out of the safe/cash register.
Your example doesn't attribute losses for the company because I doubt they budget the residual value or the old laptop. Therefore you're causing no effect on the victim
We are both refering to "thievery" but you're describing one extreme scenario and I'm describing the other extreme scenario. semantics.
The reason I say what I say, is because somebody stole my car and the term "he could afford it" came up more than once. Meanwhile I was left without transport for a while