this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
264 points (97.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43970 readers
818 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me it was "buy high quality pillow" because you sleep for one thrid of a day etc. I needed a new pillow anyway so I came to the store and bought the best they had. And it was ... ok. Like it's a fine pillow but my sleeping haven't improved really, it's basically the same. So I was disapointed :(

So, which life pro tip disappointed you?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fjordbasa@lemmy.world 136 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think when people say to but high quality items, they mean to spend what they’re worth. Getting the most expensive thing doesn’t really guarantee a quality item, but cheaping out makes it much more likely that you’ll end up with something lackluster. Plus, something like sleep can be fairly complicated and is connected to your habits, what you’ve eaten, or schedule, etc., so expecting a single change (pillow) to make a huge difference may not be realistic.

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're usually fine using a cheap item. If you use it enough to break it, then you need a quality item.

[–] DichotoDeezNutz@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah the old Harbor Freight rule

[–] Steve@startrek.website 14 points 1 year ago

Obligatory I’ve been using the same $20 impact socket set professionally for 20 years and its fine

[–] fjordbasa@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I concur with that general rule!

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You also get diminishing returns.

If you spend £400 on a bike instead of £200, it might actually be nearly twice as good, but spending £2000 doesn't mean it will be ten times as good, when you're in to bikes that cost £10k+ you're talking about fractions of a percent better than the one that costs many percent less.

The top of the range items are good for enthusiasts, but almost always not worth it for casual consumers.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For a $200 bike, it's never going to work the way it's intended to work. ANY bike you buy at a department store--and many that you buy at general sporting goods stores--will be garbage. In 1995, the rule of thumb was to spend at least $500 on a bike to get something that you could realistically ride every single day; that's about $1000 today.

I'm saying this as someone that worked at bike stores as a mechanic off and one over about 15 years; the cheap dept. store bikes someply can't be fixed and adjusted to work the way that their owners expect.

(PS - yes, fixies are cheap and light. No, you should not under any circumstances ride them on public streets or trails. If you do, sooner or later you will have a serious accident that will involve stitches, broken bones, possibly surgery, and probably rehab.)

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I concur with you, but I'd phrase it in a different way: if your budget is $200 for a bike, you should be shopping for a used bike-shop/reputable-brand bike on Craigslist or whatever.

Also, agreed about fixies, except that switching the flip-flop hub to single-speed mode and adding brakes makes it fine.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Well, that's why I specified fixie rather than single speed. 🙂 I'm not a fan of single speeds since they're inefficient, but they're not inherently unsafe, and I'm not going to tell people that they're suicidally stupid if they ride one.

[–] Bye@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very true for bikes in my experience. Guitars as well.

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

£500 - £1000 is the sweet spot for electric guitars. Anything much higher than that is the exact same guitar, just with extra bling.

Acoustic/classical guitars are a bit different and even though they still suffer diminishing returns, a higher price can be more easily justified.