Asklemmy

43970 readers

863 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

230

What is something you dislike but still begrudgingly use? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by EggsCurrently@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

281 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This question was inspired by my hatred of Temporal Anti-Aliasing which, in many games nowadays, is poorly used as a performance bandaid. On lower resolutions it will smudge and blur the image and certain bad cases of TAA will cause visible ghosting.

Yet in spite of all this, certain games won't let you turn it off or have hair/fur/foliage look like dogshit without it so sometimes I still use it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] emptyother@programming.dev 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Browsers. Firefox hasnt given me reason to doubt. Yet. And I find that odd. Still uses it. Because every other big browser have given me reasons.

Generally "free" stuff from big companies is giving me more and more the heebie-jeebies. Even if they have good reputation. But there's NO WAY I could ever pay for everything I use. Nor donate to every deserving person who has given their free time to create and publish FOSS.

[–] Caaaaarrrrlll@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Mozilla really pushes Pocket through Firefox. I've gone through the about:config to get rid of it. Pocket gives me doubts.

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They also push their VPN a lot. Every week or two I open Firefox and they send me to their VPN page on their website telling me to try it.

Like no. I'm not interested in paying for a rebranded mullvad.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

I can understand your frustration, but they need to generate revenue somehow, and presently I think it's the VPN, donations, and Google default search money.

At least the VPN aligns with their core values.

[–] tyftler@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

I recommend Librewolf. It's a privacy focused fork of firefox. They apply their own patches to every new firefox release so you always have the newest features of firefox minus the bloat.

Comes preinstalled with ublock-origin, no Telemetry, no Mozilla VPN, no pocket, no prompts to create a mozilla account, no ads on the start page, default search engine is ddg and deletes all cookies (exept for whitelisted sites) on launch.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

I was a huge fan of Read It Later, which became Pocket.

I absolutely fucking refuse to use what it has turned into.

[–] cjpu@noc.social 3 points 1 year ago

I think I'd use Pocket more if I could export from into a selfhosted app.

[–] ShitOnABrick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Should look into the ladybug browser firefox while the only "decent" browser isn't great nether and ladybug looks really promising