this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
72 points (95.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43970 readers
709 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I still regularly watch the first three as a dumb fun action trilogy.

Also, yes; Davy Jones is the best CGI to be put onscreen since probably ever.

[–] narwhalperson@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agreed. Also, I think it was quite the power move to have a character so evil that they cut out their own heart, then made the actual villain a tiny British man who embodies capitalism.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think it was that he was so evil, he was so hurt and betrayed by Calypso.

I actually kinda like Cutler Beckett as the true villain. He represents the world at large and the turn of the century, the literal end of the age of piracy. And you have this ragtag group of murderers and miscreants trying to stand up for their way of life.

It's all framed as a heroic last stand, of course.

[–] narwhalperson@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, I agree. I liked the decision to not have Davy jones be entirely villainous. Although I did take issue with the inconsistency of the story later on. Like, if Jones can stand in a bucket of sea water to go on land, then can’t he just fill some sealed shoes with water and walk on land? It’s all rather ambiguous.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rule of cool? Bucket of water at least kind of makes sense, while wet socks is just lame

Yes, although I still love the idea of Davy Jones running around with tiny water buckets strapped to each of his feet.