this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
471 points (92.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
638 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
mekhos@lemmy.ml
tmpod@lemmy.pt
14specks@lemmy.ml
471
Will the world ever stop being anti-intellectual? (discuss.online)
submitted 1 year ago by ThePenitentOne@discuss.online to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
284 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

One of the most aggravating things to me in this world has to be the absolutely rampant anti-intellectualism that dominates so many conversations and debates, and its influence just seems to be expanding. Do you think there will ever actually be a time when this ends? I'd hope so once people become more educated and cultural changes eventually happen, but as of now it honestly infuriates me like few things ever have.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's alright, Rand was wrong about that statement just like she was wrong about virtually everything she said.

[โ€“] RedQuestionAsker2@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Seriously. Bizarre quote to take as truth ~~on a communist forum~~

[โ€“] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

tbf lemmy.ml is mostly neolib in practice.

Wait, but that's a hexbear user? What?

[โ€“] RedQuestionAsker2@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're right. I just saw they were a comrade bear and made the assumption

[โ€“] Outdoor_Catgirl@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

They're a haver of interesting takes, to say the least

[โ€“] AlpineSteakHouse@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah it's a bit. No one actually unironically identifies as anti-intellectual.

I'm kinda of a Diogenes figure. Sometimes you get "behold a man" and sometimes you get a homeless man yelling at passerbys.

[โ€“] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm kinda of a Diogenes figure.

No. You're just being obnoxiously smug while expecting people to praise you as some sort of eccentric philosopher.

โ€œBut the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.โ€ โ€• Carl Sagan

There's countless "Digoenes figures" like yourself already and they all believe they are the Main Character, too. And like you already did in the other comment chain here, they also get just as mad when their junk philosophy (such as, in your case, Ayn Rand) gets called out. cringe

[โ€“] AlpineSteakHouse@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. You're just being obnoxiously smug while expecting people to praise you as some sort of eccentric philosopher.

Literally describing myself as a homeless man and anti-intellectual. No one is taking it seriously but you man.