this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
573 points (93.0% liked)

Lemmy

12568 readers
26 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ech@lemm.ee 126 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lotta people coming here from Reddit expecting 1:1 replacement, and then get pissy that the 2 man dev team that's just trying to keep up with this sudden burst in activity isn't at parity with the multi-million dollar company that's been developing their site for almost 2 decades.

Honestly, I'm just tired of the constant comparison. Lemmy can be it's own thing. It's a work in progress and it has a lot of promise, but for anyone looking for their reddit experience, there's really only one place to get that.

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't want Lemmy to be as big as reddit. When it does it's guaranteed to be enshittified.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s an open source project. It has no investors driving it toward user hostile profit seeking which is the primary force behind enshittification. A large user base doesn’t cause it, merely triggers it where the cause is already present.

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm aware, that doesn't mean it's impossible though.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Enshitified is the wrong word imo. Reddit went downhill long before the API changes. Most popular subreddits were filled with karma farming bots spamming the same shit over and over.

By the end I only used reddit for news and niche hobbies.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

"Enshittification" is the wrong word for everything. It is both often used incorrectly for what it means, and doesn't even represent what it means well. People just like it because it has the word shit in it. It's a bad term and I can't wait for it to fall into obscurity.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 0 points 1 year ago

Then tell us how it would happen. You seem to know for sure it's not impossible.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Instance admins are already compromised sometimes. They can be bribed or get greedy.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then why aren't you setting up your own instance? You do have the option.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because I don't have to for them to be terrible or to prove what I said is right.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you said is right, so what? Is your only course of action going to be to loudly moan about it, on an instance whose admins can also be bribed or get greedy as you say?

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't have to take action on a fact to have the right to state it.

You might not like the fact that Lemmy admins are just as susceptible to corruption as everyone else, but no one is going to stop saying it simply because you don't want to hear it. And you can't bully us into being quiet about it, either.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody's bullying you. We're just surprised you aren't doing anything about the thing that's clearly bothering you.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you're actually doing is forum sliding to protect corrupt Lemmy admins as if it'll get you someplace, and it won't.

I won't play your stupid little game anymore. Bye

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 0 points 1 year ago

Despite you complaining about the prospect of corrupt Lemmy admins, I'll bet money that you didn't vet the admins of any instance before signing up. Slacktivism at its finest.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Also, fuck that guys tone. Condescending prick calling other people pedantic.