Thank you for demonstrating why "tankie" is a thought-terminating cliché. Everything I've said is anti-war and sympathetic to the actual victims of this war, the common Ukrainian person and the folks worldwide, and particularly sub-Saharan Africa, suffering due to blanket collective punishment sanctions on Russia. You decided I was on the "bad" side and started making things up.

No war but the class war.

[–] animist@lemmy.one -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sure thing rf

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lying is bad, yo

[–] animist@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

👍🏻

[–] aponigricon@beehaw.org -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, unfortunately the .ml in the TLD of the biggest Lemmy instance is not at all coincidental. On the other hand, it seems that a huge proportion of migrant Redditors have a preference for neutral servers with more Libertarian approaches to administration like Beehaw. At least Lemmy itself is FOSS.

[–] animist@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah I'm half-anarchist half-demsoc myself and have VERY personal reasons to be against the DPRK so seeing a bunch of privileged white westerners praising the WPK makes me physically ill

[–] redditors_re_racist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

peak baizuo

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

and have VERY personal reasons to be against the DPRK

Go on

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The war in general of course. It has been a low-information cheerleading session since the beginning, with a rapid normalization of snufg films and the dehumanization of Russians.

A video of someone getting killed by a shark in Egypt has been making the rounds. It's horrible and I do not recommend watching it. But it's incredibly easy to find popular comment chains making jokes or even rejoicing in the death, as the victim was Russian.

Americans did not suddenly acquire basic media literacy skills, let alone embrace media criticism. The same jingoistic fervor used to incite a war of aggression in Iraq is back in a slightly different flavor. This time, the consent that must be manufactured is support for collective punishment against Russia and indefinite military support for Ukraine, hence the dehumanization of "orcs" and the rah-rah gullible acceptance of "we could win!" narratives that depend on positive news about UA actions and negative news about RUS actions.

[–] aponigricon@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I oppose dehumanization in all its forms, and despite being Ukrainian I have always been mindful of the humanity in this war.

With that said, the overwhelming majority of the "orc" comments that I've seen are directed not towards Russian civilians, but towards Russian combatants. Indeed, on that note Russians have been calling Ukrainians much worse things from day 1 on Russian social media, so if anyone is being dehumanized (and this is coming someone who reads Russian better than Ukrainian) I'd say it's more so Ukrainians by the Russian side, but I digress.

Name calling aside, I think it's incredibly dishonest to term the rooting and supporting for Ukraine as "jingoism" when that word describes what has been happening in Russian society for the past year far more appropriately. The American invasion of Iraq was bad and jingoist rhetoric was used to justify it, yes, but the exact same has been happening in Russia to a far more extreme degree during this war.

How can you ignore that while denouncing mere name-calling on social media and passive support in the war from the side of the West?

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The "orc" comments began with Ukrainian fascists' dehumanization of Chechens, which included but was not limited to people in the Russian military. This became popular in Western communities around the same time as the islamophobic pork fat bullet-dipping incident that was endorsed by the UA MoD. It spread to include all Russians, though it is used primarily by the most vehement Russophobes and simply tolerated by your average cheerleading liberal.

Name calling aside, I think it’s incredibly dishonest to term the rooting and supporting for Ukraine as “jingoism” when that word describes what has been happening in Russian society for the past year far more appropriately.

This is a form of absurd binary thinking. I am not required to "both sides" my criticisms in order to be honest, particularly when what I am criticizing is the dominant and uncritically accepted narrative, including what this post - and the vast majority of comments rezoonding to it - is literally an example of.

If it makes you happy, okay cool Russia is also jingoistic. Now answer me this: do you see any Russian nationalist statements in these threads?

The American invasion of Iraq was bad and jingoist rhetoric was used to justify it, yes, but the exact same has been happening in Russia to a far more extreme degree during this war.

I'm describing a repeated phenomenon in the exact same society to people who absolutely don't think of it that way. American collective consciousness is very poor at learning past lessons and applying them to current events. One reason is that they don't teach this stuff in school.

Please feel free to make this case to any Russians here that think their nationalism isn't comparable to bad examples of prior Russian nationalism.

How can you ignore that while denouncing mere name-calling on social media and passive support in the war from the side of the West?

You said you oppose dehumanization, but here you are minimizing to call it mere name-calling.

Interesting.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think this would be the appropriate time to point out that Russia can stop this war at any time by leaving, whereas Ukraine can only stop it by convincing Russia to leave. They already tried concessions, and that didn’t work.

And the rest of the world can’t stop the war at all, it can only act to prolong it or favor one side or the other.