this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
240 points (95.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
638 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My significant other ate cucumbers and onion with some ranch. I called it a cucumber onion salad. She says there aren't enough ingredients to call it a salad, because "it takes multiple ingredients". I pointed out she had three and asked what the minimum is. She refuses to answer so I ask Lemmy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Badass_panda@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

So teeeeechnically, a salad is a dish composed of mixed ingredients. You could make the argument that you mix any two set of chopped ingredients and bingo bongo, it's a salad.

However, I like to think that dishes' ingredients aren't a taxonomic thing, they're a probabilistic thing. In other words, there's no such thing as "not salad" or "salad", only shades of saladness.

  • Serve it cold? Ok it's saladier

  • It's made up of chopped ingredients? Saladier still

  • Those ingredients are mostly vegetables? Getting pretty saladish

  • They're mixed together? Even more salad like

  • They've got some sort of dressing mixed in? Now it's very likely a salad!

... and so on. To me, your SO'a dish has a pretty high Salad Probability^tm

[โ€“] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there anyway to convert a Salad Probability^tm into a Salad Factor score?

[โ€“] Jerkface@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Give me weights for the coefficients and I'll construct a matrix

[โ€“] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Here's some example weights for a salad factor

Lettuce - 10

Spinach - 9

Arugula - 7

Cabbage - 7

Tomato- 6

Carrots- 6

Cucumber - 5

Onion - 4

Olives (black) 4

Anchovies - 1

[โ€“] hydroel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are a few missing points in there IMO, like which of your ingredient is cooked, or how are they sliced? Graped carrots rises the score, but cook them and it's less likely to be a salad. Diced radish? Not in my salad, especially not cooked, but thinly sliced raw radish definitely belongs. And don't even get me started on tomatoes.

[โ€“] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn, I'm not sure the two are compatible then. The salad factor score is meant to be super easy so people don't get overwhelmed by all the possibilities and variations.

[โ€“] Badass_panda@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What we need is a salad categorizing multilayer neural network

[โ€“] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It wouldn't be hard to train on obvious salads, but what about the non obvious ones? Who do we trust to properly label these as salad or not a salad?

[โ€“] Badass_panda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We don't! That's the joy of it, just like people do, our algorithm will constantly waffle back and forth and argue with itself over whether these things are salads

[โ€“] hydroel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

TIL salad is a spectrum.

[โ€“] TheWoozy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

"Saladier" is my new favorite word of the day.

[โ€“] blackbrook@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think this is one of those words / concepts where one needs to invoke Wittgenstein's "family resemblance" idea. You're not going to find some exact set of criteria that define what people do and don't consider a salad. They instead have a "family resemblance".

Your probably idea is not a bad way of describing how that works.

[โ€“] Badass_panda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I know, I was being humorous but it is in fact the way most categorization works. Very seldom is it a taxonomy; the way we recognize faces, voices, shapes, etc ... it's all probabilistic.