Movies and TV Shows

2 readers

2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!

Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)

Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

admin@lemmy.film

509

IGN | Rotten Tomatoes Under Fire After PR Firm's Scheme to Pay Critics for Positive Reviews Uncovered (www.ign.com)

submitted 1 year ago by TheSparrowPrince@lemmy.world to c/moviesandtv@lemmy.film

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The best part - Rotten Tomatoes can be manipulated by paying several people $50. Five Hamiltons.

I know reviewing movies doesn’t pay well, but I didn’t know it was that bad.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago

How many $50 reviewers did they have to buy though?

Looking at Ophelia... huh, it's not on Rotten Tomatoes anymore...

Well, looking at ANOTHER crappy Daisy Ridley movie, Chaos Walking:

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/chaos_walking

21% rating on 154 reviews.

So 32 positive reviews and 122 negative reviews.

To hit 60% they would need to add 151 positive reviews. 183/305 total reviews.

At $50 a pop, those 151 positive reviews would run $7,550. Chump change.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

If you really want to get depressed research how much representatives and senators have been bought off with in the recent past.