Privacy

32120 readers

396 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

573

Not that you guys need the reminder, but your work sees all your browser history and you may not even be able to delete it if you wanted to (lemmy.ca)

submitted 1 year ago by t0fr@lemmy.ca to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

246 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] EmbeddedEntropy@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Use Tailscale. Much easier to configure and manage than raw WireGuard.

[–] HellAwaits@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

raw wireguard is hard to setup? since when?

[–] EmbeddedEntropy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I’ve done both. I wrote my own scripts to generate the WG config files to handle variations in configure I needed to make for my different networks (masking, IPv6, cross multiple WG networks).

After converting to Tailscale, WG is just an extra level of hassle I can now easily avoid.