Stating that China's insistent interference does not make a conspiracy theory. It states a fact. If China does not negative comments, then it should not endorse negative actions.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You almost managed to form a coherent sentence here. Wanna try again?

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

nuh uh

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why are you proud of remaining ignorant? Does learning things scare you?

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yep if you cannot beat the argument call them stupid. Poor coding Mrs bot.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What argument? You've yet to make one.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Also my pronouns are they/them, which I know you can see, so nice of you to throw another form of bigotry in there as well.
Liberals and casual bigotry, name a more iconic duo