this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
4 points (83.3% liked)

Lemmy

12575 readers
1 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
nutomic@lemmy.ml
4
How can Lemmy scale? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago by HelloLemmySup@sh.itjust.works to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I like the idea with Lemmy/kbin and the fediverse but theres something I dont understand perhaps.

If in the future Lemmy is very popular and someone wants to add their own server and federate with everyone then from that moment that new instance will get all new comments, posts, etc. from all other instances its federated with and must save them in its db. This means if Lemmy gets popular forget about little guys helping out spread the “load” because every intance still must take and save all new data. Thats a lot of processing power and storage. How can this work? I see in the future only a few instances will survive.

If somehow each instance was a node and only took care of its posts and comments and forward them to others upon request I can understand scaling but this is not how it works AFAIK. Another way would be with consensus algorithms where a node saves more thsn its own data but still not all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

At the smallest scale, you could have a node with just one user, perhaps that user creates a community or two. But this means that that instance will ONLY EVER store the subs of that one user

Honestly, once Lemmy becomes a bit more mature and stable, I will probably end up doing this. Selfhosting seems like a great way to fully break any dependence on external actors.