this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
83 points (92.8% liked)

World News

32161 readers
1195 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I still don't get how the wet market theory is less racist than the escaped from a lab theory.

[–] mim@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because one can be pinned down to government involvement, while the other can't.

It's the classic CCP defense: "We're not an authoritarian country, you're just racist!".

EDIT: not saying that it was or wasn't a lab leak, but as soon as the government shoots down the possibility with "you're racist", I immediately get suspicious. The same way that I get suspicious when Israel shoots down criticism with "you're just anti-Semitic". It's basically gaslighting with identity politics.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

It was never the theory that was racist, it was the amount of evidence behind it.

If "there's a virology lab there" was all the evidence you needed to assert it was a lab leak, chances are it's because you're racist. That's why early on, this theory was most popular with far-right reactionaries.

Meanwhile, what's been the origin story of every similar virus? Animal trade. That's why early on, this theory was most popular with actual scientists who were actually qualified to have an opinion.