this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
183 points (96.9% liked)

Privacy

32120 readers
396 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have always been curious about this. Did you get them to use other services or did they stubbornly refuse and you just accepted it? I am talking using Chrome, using Windows, using social media like Tiktok or Facebook or Instagram, etc. Bonus points if you have kids because that is even more work in the privacy realm

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"I will answer it unlike..."

That's not making things easier, that's just forcing people to adapt to your niche choices or not be able to communicate with you.

[–] VegaLyrae@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

At the time I was changing to signal, I only had google messages on my desktop, so I would answer accumulated messages at home.

There was no cell service at work so SMS didn't work, but I could use wifi.

In modern times, we have RCS so it's kind of not really a problem anymore, but everyone I know uses signal now anyways.

I didn't make it hard, I got Telegram and Matrix and met people halfway where I could. But naturally everyone I know just settled on signal since it also did SMS so it replaced an app rather than added one. Plus id didn't feel like a "sign up" since it just worked. Those days are gone but the network effect is already chugging along.

[–] Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And that's materially different from having to join Discord/Teams/Facebook because that's where someone you need to speak with communicates with how?

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

SMS doesn't require you to join any specific service except the phone service you're already paying for.

[–] Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And OP was talking about not answering 'google chat'. Calling that SMS is comparing apples to potatoes.

[–] VegaLyrae@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, this is correct.

I could not have used SMS for most of the day since I worked on the top floor of a multi-level basement. I had wifi and a VPN though.

At the time I moved to signal, Google Message, or chat or whatever was being replaced with Allo and Duo and everyone was pretty un-jazzed about the whole thing.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but OP and the people they want to connect with don't have to force their choice of proprietary app into others when there's a universal solution that works for all phones.

[–] VegaLyrae@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I'm not super happy with Signal's level of openness, but I also wouldn't call it proprietary. It is open source and I could run my own server if I really wanted to, but that would just make it harder.

At the time we were moving from a walled garden to one of 3 encrypted OSS solutions, and I had all of them until we naturally coalesced on one.

SMS at the time didn't work due to not having cell service, and while we "have" RCS now to solve that issue, I don't know anyone who uses it.