Linux

48329 readers

668 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

440

Red Hat stops all upstream and downstream work on desktop Bluetooth, multimedia applications (namely totem, rhythmbox and sound-juicer) and libfprint/fprintd - linux - kbin.social (kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago by Remontoire@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Red Hat stops all upstream and downstream work on desktop Bluetooth, multimedia applications (namely totem, rhythmbox and sound-juicer) and libfprint/fprintd (hadess.net)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kippinitreal@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can you explain why "community system" is bad? Genuinely curious, since the word community sounds like it's not controlled by corpo interests

[–] themarty27@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Community systems are not bad, that's most of Linux, but there needs to be an ethical, FOSS-friendly enterprise system to get corpos invested in Linux and FOSS. Besides, corporate systems usually have massive dev teams and upstream/open-source a lot of their work. As much as I shit on Canonical and Red Hat, they've done immense amounts of beneficial work for Linux and FOSS.

[–] kippinitreal@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That makes sense, thank you. My question above was specifically about Debian, since I've heard the point of it being community based used negatively in other places/threads too.

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

I didn't mean it in a negative light. The issue is that companies prefer to trust other companies, which is why it's good to have a moral company to point to.

[–] woelkchen@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

My question above was specifically about Debian, since I’ve heard the point of it being community based used negatively in other places/threads too.

Fun fact: For a few years HP was very invested in Debian because they saw that as the most likely successor to their old HP-UX Unix on mainframe servers.

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Basically yes. Beautifully and accurately explained.

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

It's not bad but companies like someone to talk to/blame when something goes wrong.