this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
263 points (93.4% liked)

Technology

63614 readers
2933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
263
New Terms for Firefox from Mozilla (blog.mozilla.org)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Zenlix@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Apparently mozilla wants the right to get data from firefox users. But not like general information, they want to know what data you upload or download through firefox.

Without it, we couldn’t use information typed into Firefox, for example.

What the fuck? I use firefox because I want privacy!!! Not sharing my information with a company.

We need a license to allow us to make some of the basic functionality of Firefox possible. WHY DO YOU NEED MY DATA TO MAKE FIREFOX WORK???

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Most people want features like AI

That's just not true.

as someone who runs local inference all the time, i think that centralized online models have no place anywhere near consumers. partly because the things they offer are trivial and offload critical skills, partly because they require insane amounts of energy, and partly because they are privacy nightmares. all things that are against moz's stated mission. and yet here we are.

[–] Vivendi@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is the only decent comment that I've got on this entire thread

And you seem to be right, I agree with your sentiment. If the features are unneeded, then this is the wrong step to take. The best option would be for Mozilla (who are behind Ollama I think?) to offer a locally run open model, any potato capable of running a modern browser should be able to handle 1B-7B models

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 2 days ago

moz are behind llamafiles, but ollama is a separate entity.

also, chat models are just not that useful. i'm all for their local translation models and the like, but chat is just a toy.