this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
811 points (99.6% liked)

Games

34709 readers
883 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not well versed in C&C, but it's always good to see more games open sourced.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

To use the compiled binaries, you must own the game

Was expecting a catch. Still good for modding I guess

Anyone know if this is a technologically-enforced “must” or just a “pretty please”?

[–] Ninmi@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm assuming this is more about art assets. Art is not code and you shouldn't expect them for free. It's not a catch.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 18 hours ago

Correct. The license (at least, the one I read for Red Alert) is GPLv3 with some additional stuff. The additional stuff is mostly about not using EA trademarks in your version or showing any connection to EA itself. So it appears that a clean room asset swap would be allowed as long as it includes the title screen.

[–] Jeffool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Which, in the immediate future, makes me wonder less about the things that are going to be done in code, and more about the creation of new, free, visual and audio resources that make this work. That seems like quite a noble pursuit.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Open source does not mean that the intellectual property is free. There's a lot of good that comes from this, and it's not like those games are expensive.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Though do also note that of these four, TD and RA1 were already made freeware years ago.

[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I realize. Intellectual property is an icky concept IMO but I know not everyone agrees

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Intellectual property is what allows them to make these games GPL.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The GPL is a way to make intellectual property work the way it should by default.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's only the HD remaster of TD and RA1.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Ilgaz@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you dig some experienced players comments who bought the "remastered" stuff, they are complaining that they "re-mastered" the exact same bugs that seriously annoyed the players too. They didn't fix the bugs. With the power of OSS, every bug can be fixed.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

This is a pretty standard affair for open sourced games.